DiscussMormonism.com

sisters who are gays/lesbians.
Didn't Jesus say something like "Verily verily I say, if you look to a woman in a lustful manner
you commit sin".
My heck! Since age twelve, I probably lusted after more than ten thousand women, never once
I recall sincerely trying to repent, I simply couldn't because those thoughts are part of what I am.
Last sunday I was in an NFL game, I watched Cheerleaders with pleasure.
Just because I like looking at women, do I go force any of them to do what I want.
Gays/Lesbians feel the same way, they have different needs, as long as they don't hit on me and force
others, they are normal people.
The ratio of perversion, child molestation runs higher in sexually repressed societies.
Why should I care to deny people the rights when I enjoy abundantly? Actually I am glad they exist so our
human population remains in check. They do their part.

How many Mormon men go to a football/basketball games refrain themselves of watching sweet cheerleaders?
In fact I am very much willing to bet some of those high priests, EQ presidents have season tickets closer to where
cheerleaders dance and beautifully gyrate.
It is time to confess.

Might as well go after the babes then. If you are going to repent do it for a deed, not a thought.

When was the last time you saw a parade of oddly dressed people going down the street yelling 'we're heterosexual'? Be gay or queer or whatever you want, just leave me alone while you are doing it.

squawkeye wrote:Might as well go after the babes then. If you are going to repent do it for a deed, not a thought.

When was the last time you saw a parade of oddly dressed people going down the street yelling 'we're heterosexual'? Be gay or queer or whatever you want, just leave me alone while you are doing it.

The problem is, "oddly dressed" is defined by the society in which we live. Our pioneer re-enactment folks in our local 4th of July parade are "oddly dressed". That they're giving out candy instead of yelling has little to do with their acceptance. What would the community do, if a polygamous family decided to walk in the parade wearing their 1880's dress, yelling their support for polygamy (not likely to happen, but 30 years ago a parade of gay men was unlikely to happen too)? React like the community does to the oddly-dressed gays on parade? Probably. Both are outside the norm, and therefore objects of fear and loathing.

LDS should know better. Shame on us.

Yes, homosexuality is a subset of adultery and fornication.

bcspace wrote:Yes, homosexuality is a subset of adultery and fornication.

Even grouping it that way, will not arouse the interest of most males.

Yes, Most of those Philadelphia Eagles' Cheerleaders during the Sunday Night NFL Football game, were indeed very pretty and beautiful.


Here is that Scriptural Passage, From Jesus:

Matthew 5:27-28: (New King James Version):

Adultery in the Heart

27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old,[a] ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ [b]28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.


Footnotes:

Matthew 5:27 NU-Text and M-Text omit to those of old.
Matthew 5:27 Exodus 20:14; Deuteronomy 5:18

moksha wrote:Even grouping it that way, will not arouse the interest of most males.

It will if it's about lipstick lesbians.

bcspace wrote:Yes, homosexuality is a subset of adultery and fornication.

Are you qualifying this remark for Human species only?
Or are you clueless about homosexual behavior being very normal act among
most species you know of.
Dogs,Cows,horses.cats, rabbits, wolves, Bison, chimps, most gorillas, monkeys and thousand other animals
do this stuff.
So much so that 50%of Bison males do homosexual acts regularly.
And you come here tell me it is abnormal among human beings?

Read or listen some informative stuff about basic evolution facts, instead of listening canned, regurgitated
malicious, racist, void of facts stuff from your religious leaders.

Be open minded for a change.

solomarineris wrote:Be open minded for a change.

Surely you jest.

How many Mormon men go to a football/basketball games refrain themselves of watching sweet cheerleaders?
In fact I am very much willing to bet some of those high priests, EQ presidents have season tickets closer to where
cheerleaders dance and beautifully gyrate.
It is time to confess.

Some probably do, but the proper leftist response to this state of affairs is to form and mobilize a Mormon Men for Sweet Cheerleaders interest group to agitate and lobby the GAs for a loosening of sexual standards for Priesthood holders regarding their psychological states while at football games.

The next step, once the first goal is achieved, is to agitate and lobby for the elimination of church's opposition to adultery, so that the horniest and most sexually liberated Priesthood holders could have affairs with the sweet cheerleaders without the stigma of sin and excommunication being attached to them.

After all, adulterers are people too, and should have the same rights so sexual fulfillment as monogamous husbands.

After that, sweet cheerleaders will form interest groups who's main function will be to sue the horny Priesthood holders for paternity. By this time, however, Obama will probably have made abortion on demand federally funded and free to anyone who wants one, which may make the sweet cheerleader litigation movement moot.