Page 1 of 17

A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:45 am
by _Mister Scratch
Well, there isn't much point in writing an "introduction" or "hook" for such a thing. Just read it and weep:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=39346

Joseph Antley wrote:Last night I attended a fireside at BYU by Mark Kastleman, one of the co-founders of Candeo and the author of several books. What really struck me was something Kastleman said President Gordon B. Hinckley said at a training meeting for mission presidents. He said that President Hinckley said that the the "overflowing scourge" and "desolating sickness" prophesied of in D&C 45:31 is pornography in the modern world.

"And there shall be men standing in that generation, that shall not pass until they shall see an overflowing scourge; for a desolating sickness shall cover the land. But my disciples shall stand in holy places, and shall not be moved" (D&C 45:31-32).

I found this very interesting.


Yep! I bet you did! But probably not as much as this fellow:

Kollow wrote:Certainly sounds like a description of pornography to me. I spent a couple years at the SLC Library as a security guard in my early twenties. 80% of my job was to catch people viewing porn on the public library computers. I caught men looking at porn in the childrens section of the library. I caught young boys looking at the some of the most discusting hardcore porn imaginable, and married men looking at gay porn and all of this in public place where anyone could see you surfing for porn. Somedays that's all I did was kick men off the computer for looking at porn.


???? It is intriguing to note that this poster understands the difference between "normal" porn and "some of the most discusting [sic] hardcore porn imaginable." Obviously, this individual has a lot of experience with this material.

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:26 am
by _Dr. Shades
Mister Scratch wrote:???? It is intriguing to note that this poster understands the difference between "normal" porn and "some of the most discusting [sic] hardcore porn imaginable." Obviously, this individual has a lot of experience with this material.


Oh, I don't know. Maybe he has no experience; perhaps he only saw the standard, run-of-the-mill porn and just assumed it was "the most discusting [sic] hardcore porn imaginable" since he didn't know any better. But I'm just speculating.

Back to the topic, though, I'm totally confused. Rather than require some kid to kick porn-watchers off of computers, wouldn't it have been ten times easier to just block the library server from accessing porn sites??

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:02 am
by _ludwigm
Dr. Shades wrote:...
Back to the topic, though, I'm totally confused. Rather than require some kid to kick porn-watchers off of computers, wouldn't it have been ten times easier to just block the library server from accessing porn sites??

Can be problematic.
When I have worked for a multi (it was the Siemens but this is not the proper place for an ad ...) I couldn't download true type fonts from virginia.edu, and couldn't read "Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet" of ETB from http://speeches.BYU.edu/reader/reader.php?id=6751

by the way it is worth to read ...

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:10 am
by _Dr. Shades
Yeah, but servers can be programmed to avoid sites by URL and not merely by keyword search.

It sounds like your company, ludwigm, was a bit too draconian.

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:28 am
by _ludwigm
Dr. Shades wrote:Yeah, but servers can be programmed to avoid sites by URL and not merely by keyword search.
It sounds like your company, ludwigm, was a bit too draconian.

It is no more my company.
They have begun to rot, and fired me (and many of us).
- - or - -
They have fired me so began to rot ...

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:12 pm
by _gramps
Interesting!

I wonder why so many non-Mormons need to access porn through the library?

Don't they have their own connections at home? Or are these all those who have left the church and thus become penniless, no longer able to afford even a dial-up connection and left with nothing but a seat at the computer pool in the library.

If that is not a warning to those who were maybe thinking of leaving the church, I don't know what is?

It is clear what happens after you leave. Sad. Very sad. :(

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:17 pm
by _antishock8
Huh. People being murdered isn't the scourge. Child abuse isn't the scourge. People stealing isn't the scourge.

It's porn.

Control control control. These people.

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:38 pm
by _The Dude
Here we go again.

A few weeks ago Mormons were overtaken by a storm of gossip about apocalyptic remarks supposedly made by Boyd K Packer at a stake conference in Utah. The official response from the Church was a warning to members about the innacurate nature of second/third-hand rumors, and a reminder that a message to one congregation may not be meant for all Mormons to hear. If they wanted a message to go to the whole church, then they would give it in the semi-annual General Conference.

So now we have Joseph Antley over on the Mormon Apologetics and Discussion Board doing the same thing or worse:

What really struck me was something Kastleman said President Gordon B. Hinckley said at a training meeting for mission presidents.


whisper... whisper... DC45:13 is a prophesy about latter day pornography... whisper... whisper... person A says it came from person B who was talking to person C at the time...

Hey, maybe the overflowing scourge and desolating sickness is GOSSIP in the church.

Now there's a thought.

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:38 pm
by _Some Schmo
The Dude wrote: Hey, maybe the overflowing scourge and desolating sickness is GOSSIP in the church.

Maybe.

Or maybe the scourge is making stupid, baseless assumptions about vague, generic passages written almost 2 centuries ago and pretending it's "inspiration" or "revelation."

Re: A MAD Porn Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:56 pm
by _SatanWasSetUp
Another example of interpreting vague scripture to mean something specific. In the 50s, this scripture could've been a prophecy of communism. It could also be used against homosexuality. Anything that the church thinks is evil can be the "scourge" and "sickness" in that scripture.