The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Dear MormonDiscussions.com participants:

A crescendo of recent criticisms of this board (and, by extension, the way I run it) have convinced me that the Great Moderatorial Experiment needs to be implemented A.S.A.P. So, this is to serve notice that it's about to get underway.

I need to tinker a bit with my administrators' controls, since they're not exactly intuitive, but I'll be implementing the required changes (adding moderatorial privileges, updating the rules of the board, etc.) one by one over the course of today. By tomorrow everything should be fully in place.

Therefore, the Great Moderatorial Experiment will run partially from today, but fully from tomorrow, until New Year's Day. Once that day hits, I'll be starting a new thread, probably titled "The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART THREE: The aftermath" or something similar. In it, we'll all have a big pow-wow and discuss what worked, what didn't work, what change(s) should be made permanent, and which one(s) of my old policies should be reverted to.

With that in mind, please refer to this thread and follow along:

ITEM #1 will remain the same, WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDENDUM (consider it "item #1.5"):

Although we already delete in real life information, we moderators will now delete any on-board reference to anything that transpired in either the chat room or via PM. From here on out, that which takes place in the chat room stays in the chat room. Similarly, that which takes place on PM stays on PM. Any hint of a reference to something that transpired in either venue will be immediately and unceremoniously deleted without comment.*

ITEM #2 and ITEM #3 are now moot. Here are our new moderators:

  • harmony will now moderate all forums.
  • Scottie will continue to moderate all forums, but he'll now start moderating them the way he's been wanting to moderate them.
  • marg will moderate the Celestial Forum (only).
  • cksalmon will moderate the Terrestrial Forum (only).

ITEM #4 is essentially the same, with the addendum that liz3564 and I will begin observing our brand-new "item 1.5," above.

ITEM #5, ITEM #6, and ITEM #7 are unchanged. Moderators, please be sure to observe #6. You may decide among yourselves who will contact whom; I don't care just so long as they're all contacted. Everyone else, I respectfully request that you observe #7.

ITEM #8 and ITEM #9 are hereby modified. The new moderators will indeed keep their powers after the formal end of the experiment and throughout the upcoming pow-wow, since there's the distinct possibility that everyone will want the new moderators to remain onboard. Why strip them of their moderatorhood only to reinstate it? I may as well just save myself the step. Things will go back to the way they were--and people will cease being moderators--only after the community decides as much.

ITEM #10 is now moot.

Here are two brand-new additions to bring to your attention:

ITEM #11: People have made it clear that merely moving posts to a different forum isn't enough to convince people to observe baseline expectations of conduct. Therefore, although I'm not comfortable with outright banning, I'm now going to entertain the possibility of one-week suspensions.* This is to aid the new moderators just-in-case. Don't panic; the only thing that would earn a suspension would be a brazen attempt to circumvent a moderatorial decision. This would include such things as A) copying-and-pasting back into the Terrestrial Forum a post that had been moved to the Telestial Forum, B) Persistently refusing to observe item 1.5, above; C) deliberately attempting to circumvent the word-censor, e.g. coming up with a creative spelling in order to slip a filthy four-letter word into the Terrestrial Forum; and D) anything else similar to A, B, or C, above.

ITEM #12: The people have spoken, so I'll bring back smilies, much as it pains me to do so. There will be limits, however: If there is more than one smilie per paragraph, or if there are two or more smilies in a row, it'll be considered "smilie-spam" and immediately moved to the Outer Darkness forum. Moderators, please observe.

Whew! That being said, you might feel a bit hamstrung. If you're having doubts about what's expected of you, then allow me to hold up a shining example:

Sethbag.

Yes, Sethbag. Carefully observe how he interacts: He consistently gets his points across, he says exactly what he wants to say, yet he skillfully manages to avoid offending anyone (at least, I've never gotten any complaints about him). I'm unaware of him being involved in any sort of feud with anyone or being the cause of anyone's departure--or displeasure, for that matter. You want to survive this experiment? Then be like Sethbag.

With that, let the Great Moderatorial Experiment begin.

*You might say to yourself, "But Dr. Shades, isn't that a violation of your founding principles?" I answer, "Yes, indeed it is." Obviously Plan A didn't work, so we must now move to Plan B--at least for a month.

.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _harmony »

I'm on a blackberry, on vacation. Won't be hOme until Sat. I'm assuming there will be some training. Will seed if I can access a comp tonight
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Scottie »

<-- * Drools with anticipation *
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _asbestosman »

Scottie wrote:<-- * Drools with anticipation *

Is there a smilie for that?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_rcrocket

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _rcrocket »

Congrats to Harmony. I guess I missed that appointment. She is a fine person although fixated on the open the books stuff, but nobody is perfect.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Runtu »

rcrocket wrote:Congrats to Harmony. I guess I missed that appointment. She is a fine person although fixated on the open the books stuff, but nobody is perfect.


Totally off-topic, but would you send me an email? I tried to respond to a PM you sent, but alas, you appear not to allow PMs to you, or something. :)
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _The Nehor »

:)

New Paragraph ;)

New Paragraph :(

Nope, not on yet.......
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Dr. Shades »

UPDATE:

  • I tried to reinstate smilies, but for some reason they're not showing up. Standby to stand by.
  • I have yet to totally overhaul the "Rules of the Board." I'll post when it's been done.

Everything else--bringing the new moderators on board, giving them the appropriate powers, sending them notification, and directing them to the moderatorial "how to"s--has been accomplished.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Scottie »

Dr. Shades wrote:UPDATE:

  • I tried to reinstate smilies, but for some reason they're not showing up. Standby to stand by.
  • I have yet to totally overhaul the "Rules of the Board." I'll post when it's been done.

Everything else--bringing the new moderators on board, giving them the appropriate powers, sending them notification, and directing them to the moderatorial "how to"s--has been accomplished.

Let the reign of terror begin!!!! bwahahahaha!!!!
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _asbestosman »

Dr. Shades wrote:UPDATE:I tried to reinstate smilies, but for some reason they're not showing up. Standby to stand by

I like Nehor and all, but can you disable smilies for him just so that the rest of us can have them for longer? :wink:
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
Post Reply