I won't post a link to avoid Shades' getting into trouble, but download it while you can (the pdf copy is not the best, but it is legible) before the Church's legal bulldogs get an injunction. Enjoy!
.
.
....
2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
-
_Rollo Tomasi
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4085
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm
2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-
_gramps
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
I was just going through the disciplinary procedures.
Do you find anything there about resignation?
I don't seem to be looking in the right place, I guess. Let me know if you come across it.
Do you find anything there about resignation?
I don't seem to be looking in the right place, I guess. Let me know if you come across it.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
Adrian Beverland
-
_Rollo Tomasi
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4085
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
gramps wrote:I was just going through the disciplinary procedures.
Do you find anything there about resignation?
I don't seem to be looking in the right place, I guess. Let me know if you come across it.
Resignation is discussed on pages 148-50 -- on p. 149 there's a change when one resigns while "suspected transgression" is pending; it no longer gets in the way of resignation.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-
_Scottie
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
A poll on MAD asked if it was unethical to post this online. What do you guys think?
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman
I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
-
_gramps
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
Rollo Tomasi wrote:gramps wrote:I was just going through the disciplinary procedures.
Do you find anything there about resignation?
I don't seem to be looking in the right place, I guess. Let me know if you come across it.
Resignation is discussed on pages 148-50 -- on p. 149 there's a change when one resigns while "suspected transgression" is pending; it no longer gets in the way of resignation.
Thanks, I will check that out.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
Adrian Beverland
-
_cinepro
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4502
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
Scottie wrote:A poll on MAD asked if it was unethical to post this online. What do you guys think?
I don't know. I'll see what the CHI says about the morality of posting religious procedural manuals online.
-
_JohnStuartMill
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
cinepro wrote:Scottie wrote:A poll on MAD asked if it was unethical to post this online. What do you guys think?
I don't know. I'll see what the CHI says about the morality of posting religious procedural manuals online.
My gut instinct is to say that posting the CHI is only immoral insofar as it is illegal to post copyrighted documents without their owners' permission.
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
-
_Heresy
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:51 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
Is it moral to put out a detailed manual that controls people's lives, and then not let them see it? Members have no way to know when the Bishop has overstepped his bounds. Many don't even know this thing exists.
-
_cinepro
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4502
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
Heresy wrote:Is it moral to put out a detailed manual that controls people's lives, and then not let them see it? Members have no way to know when the Bishop has overstepped his bounds. Many don't even know this thing exists.
Wouldn't that be weird if 100 years from now, Church members treated the CHI like we do the D&C? It could be broken up into chapters and verses, and we could study if for a year in Sunday School.
-
_asbestosman
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6215
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm
Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....
cinepro wrote:Wouldn't that be weird if 100 years from now, Church members treated the CHI like we do the D&C? It could be broken up into chapters and verses, and we could study if for a year in Sunday School.
To think that Mark Twain complained that the Book of Mormon was chloroform in print.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO