Page 1 of 1
This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:25 pm
by _Imwashingmypirate
N/T
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:17 am
by _solomarineris
Imwashingmypirate wrote:N/T
Why?
Do you find this board;
Objectionable?
Pleasant?
Void of substance?
Inferior to MAD&b or RFM?
If I was the owner I'd leave it as it is, because;
People are able to speak their mind.
It's good.
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:46 am
by _Danna
The board is not 'anti' at all, unless your definition of anti includes just anyone who rejects Mormonism. My private definition of anti is:
Persons who, while campaigning for rejection of the claims of Mormonism, refuse to submit their own beliefs to the same scrutiny (arbitrary antis), or,
Persons who actively oppose Mormonism at the expense of reason and truth (fallacious antis).
I don't think that those who question and investigate the truth claims of Mormonism are 'antis', nor are people who want to disseminate factual information about the truth claims of Mormonism.
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm
by _Imwashingmypirate
I wasn't suggesting it seriously be changed. Sorry to offend! I was merely joking. Guess some people just don't get me.
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:23 pm
by _Danna
Not offended
Was just thinking with my fingers.
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:33 pm
by _cinepro
No. I wouldn't want MA&D to lose their #1 Google rating for the search "Anti-Mormon Discussions".
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:29 am
by _bcspace
N/T?
The board itself is not antiMormon in nature. Most of the people posting on it are. I, a TBM, can speak my mind here.
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:11 am
by _Yoda
bcspace wrote:N/T?
The board itself is not antiMormon in nature. Most of the people posting on it are. I, a TBM, can speak my mind here.
Amen, BC! This is one of the few things you and I can agree on. LOL
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:26 am
by _Imwashingmypirate
liz3564 wrote:bcspace wrote:N/T?
The board itself is not antiMormon in nature. Most of the people posting on it are. I, a TBM, can speak my mind here.
Amen, BC! This is one of the few things you and I can agree on. LOL
that's like saying the people may not be true but the chuch is lol.
N/T= No Text. I was just playing around. Most of the stuff in here would prevent me having a TR. I have to wear blinkers now :P
Re: This place should be named "Anti-Mormon Discussions" N/T
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:55 pm
by _dartagnan
Guess some people just don't get me
No, we get it. Especially ater you started a thread aking questions about concerns with Church history, and then rejected a response including a hyperlink because, according to you, it was "anti-Mormon literature."
Yes, we know. Many of us here have a Mormon background, and we know how it is engrained in the Mormon mind to believe anything that questions or criticizes is "anti" and should be ignored solely on that basis. Otherwise you would have to go repent for exposing yourself to the grips of Satan. Take a spiritual bath so to speak. Like you said, you couldn't even get a TM if you hang out with people like us.
Which makes it even more humorous when Mormons ask questions as if they really want answers. Any answer provided can be categorized as "anti" and dismissed on that basis alone.