Basta?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Inconceivable
_Emeritus
Posts: 3405
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:44 am

Basta?

Post by _Inconceivable »

Anyone mind explaining what this word means?

I thought I had a decent handle on Latin and it's derivitives. Or am I mistaken?

Is it an Asian word? Maybe ancient Egyptian slang?

Perhaps someone that professes a strong academic understanding of languages, cultures or even world religeons might explain it to me.

..if his schedule will allow.



.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Basta?

Post by _Chap »

It's "Like, enough already!" in Italian.

I think you have to realise that this board has lost a real renaissance man in DCP. Sauce bottles ain't in it ...
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Tiktaalik
_Emeritus
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:17 pm

Re: Basta?

Post by _Tiktaalik »

In Spanish it also means "enough".
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Basta?

Post by _Chap »

At any rate, events have now definitively established that one thing "Basta!" does not mean in any language, known, unknown or imaginary is "I'm outa here for good, for the sake of spending more time with my wife and kids, and because no-one here is worth reading or responding to".
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Basta?

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Chap wrote:At any rate, events have now definitively established that one thing "Basta!" does not mean in any language, known, unknown or imaginary is "I'm outa here for good, for the sake of spending more time with my wife and kids, and because no-one here is worth reading or responding to".

It was never intended to mean that. As I've said all along, I feel entirely free -- obligated, in fact -- to come back for announcements.

And, if there's a legitimate question, I'll consider answering it.

You'll see, over the next months, what I meant. It will be apparent.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Basta?

Post by _Chap »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Chap wrote:At any rate, events have now definitively established that one thing "Basta!" does not mean in any language, known, unknown or imaginary is "I'm outa here for good, for the sake of spending more time with my wife and kids, and because no-one here is worth reading or responding to".

It was never intended to mean that. As I've said all along, I feel entirely free -- obligated, in fact -- to come back for announcements.

And, if there's a legitimate question, I'll consider answering it.

You'll see, over the next months, what I meant. It will be apparent.


QFT.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Basta?

Post by _harmony »

Chap wrote:
QFT.


You obviously don't speak Daniel. Those of us who do understood exactly what he was saying.

I also speak fluent Teenager.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply