Daniel Peterson wrote:harmony wrote:Has it?
There's no possible way of knowing, since the FARMS Review has been carefully hidden, so that harmony can't read it, at
http://farms.byu.edu/publications/review/
What was the quip?
Mister Scratch wrote:I was reviewing some of the old posts on this thread, and I felt that it would be useful to summarize some of the unanswered questions:
1) What motivated the Brethren to "invite" FARMS to join fully and officially with BYU? We know that it had something to do with FARMS's "fundraising" and PR, as per Reynolds, but what, specifically, was it? The Ziggurat?
2) What was the "quip" which clued DCP into the fact that the hostility in the FARMS Review needed to be dialed down?
I've never heard of any "'quip' which clued [me] into the fact that the hostility in the FARMS Review needed to be dialed down."
Nor have I said any such thing. And I'm the only person on this board in a position to serve as a source about the quip.
What was the quip? You've been asked multiple times about it, and yet you dodge each time. Should we assume that it's a source of embarrassment for you?
Mister Scratch wrote:5) Why, during this very tumultuous time, was the FARMS accountant terminated?
As I've pointed out to Scratch, that's absolutely none of his business.
You also pointed out that it was supposedly "confidential," which, if true, doesn't reflect very well on the fact that you were blabbing about it here on this messageboard.
And who said anything about a "tumultuous time"?
I think it's well implied by the articles I linked to, and it's certainly implicit in the fact that you nearly resigned over the stress of it all.
Does he make this stuff up deliberately, or is he just a poor reader? I can't quite decide.
Do you launch smear campaigns and treat people badly because you are a moral degenerate, or because you think it's funny?