DiscussMormonism.com

Ultimately this paper shows that LDS doctrine and practice maintained that civil marriages specifically between blacks and whites were categorically prohibited, were unnatural and contrary to God’s law, would never be acceptable within the LDS Church (or if so, only in some future eschatological period); they were deeply offensive to social norms and if allowed to be performed, would lead to the destruction of not just society but indeed humanity.

In 1978, with the removal of the priesthood ban by Spencer Kimball, any justification for banning black-white marriages within LDS temples ended, although some LDS General Authorities, such as Apostle Boyd K. Packer, reportedly continued to discourage or even prohibit them for a few years afterward.

In researching this paper, when coming across the statements and theological arguments that LDS leaders made against black-white marriage, most of the time I was reminded of just how similar, even identical, these sounded to my ears in relation to the arguments now presented by LDS leaders against homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

Currently the LDS Church fully accepts black-white civil marriages and has performed black-white sealings in temples for more than thirty years – and the feared and promised destruction of humanity has not taken place. What was once a dire sin and shameful practice, utterly prohibited because of the enormous social, political, spiritual, and soteriological consequences for all of humanity, is no longer a heinous sin and has now been embraced, accepted, and celebrated by the faithful. With this clear and near-perfect precedent set, I can only demand to know how soon before LDS leaders will allow same-sex couples the free agency to marry, even civilly, those whom we love?

In researching this paper, when coming across the statements and theological arguments that LDS leaders made against black-white marriage, most of the time I was reminded of just how similar, even identical, these sounded to my ears in relation to the arguments now presented by LDS leaders against homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

rcrocket wrote:
I lectured at the UCLA law school on this subject. The California Supreme Court used the ban on miscegenation as an analogue to strike down same sex marriage. However, it was fairly acknolwedged by my auditors at UCLA that the black community, as a majority (it is hard to define exactly the "black community") finds the struggle for racial civil rights not equivalent to the same sex issue, and many find the comparison offensively derogatory of their struggle.

cinepro wrote:Practically speaking, how were LDS of a century ago supposed to know that their leaders were just expressing their fallible opinion on the subject of interracial marriage, and were they (the leaders and the followers) less sure of their position on God's feelings towards interracial marriage as modern LDS (leaders and followers) are about His position towards SSM?

rcrocket wrote: He said that to reduce the stress upon your marriage you should try to marry within your community of believers and your race.

Ray A wrote:

rcrocket wrote: He said that to reduce the stress upon your marriage you should try to marry within your community of believers and your race.

The best way to reduce stress in marriage is to get a divorce.

rcrocket wrote:I would suspect that most posters on this board have had or are having marital difficulties rising to the level of divorce, wouldnjasay?

rcrocket wrote:I would suspect that most posters on this board have had or are having marital difficulties rising to the level of divorce, wouldnjasay?