DiscussMormonism.com

beastie wrote:You're a real class act, Will. Always have been.

Ludd wrote: If my wife wore a dress that barely covered her breasts, I think I would expect such comments. Maybe that's why the woman in question is now divorced (per what was said on another thread about her). Her husband probably didn't like the fact that she was wearing porn-star attire in public.

KimberlyAnn wrote:

Ludd wrote: If my wife wore a dress that barely covered her breasts, I think I would expect such comments. Maybe that's why the woman in question is now divorced (per what was said on another thread about her). Her husband probably didn't like the fact that she was wearing porn-star attire in public.

Ludd, would you please post a link to the aforementioned thread?

Thank you in advance.

KA

Ludd, let's take the examples you listed from Ms. Jack's thread, and allow Brother Schryver's Priesthood leaders to review them. Let's sit down with Brother Schryver's bishop and explain that he, willingly identifying himself as a representative and apologist for the LDS Church was:

1. Brother Schryver, a Melchizedek Priesthood holder who has been married in the temple, was making ogling comments on a public website about a young divorced woman's breasts.

2. Brother Schryver was rabidly insulting a variety of women, some members of the Church, based on his perception of their looks.


And then, we wil allow Brother Schryver's Bishop and/or Stake Preident to view Ms. Jack's thread in full.

I would LOVE to be a fly on that wall.

Ludd, let's take the examples you listed from Ms. Jack's thread, and allow Brother Schryver's Priesthood leaders to review them. Let's sit down with Brother Schryver's bishop and explain that he, willingly identifying himself as a representative and apologist for the LDS Church was:

1. Brother Schryver, a Melchizedek Priesthood holder who has been married in the temple, was making ogling comments on a public website about a young divorced woman's breasts.

2. Brother Schryver was rabidly insulting a variety of women, some members of the Church, based on his perception of their looks.


And then, we wil allow Brother Schryver's Bishop and/or Stake Preident to view Ms. Jack's thread in full.

I would LOVE to be a fly on that wall.

Quote:
No need now. I've pointed him to this message board and given him specific links to the threads in question. I think that's him I hear laughing right now from half way across town.

You see, my dear antagonist, the flaw in your plan to "expose" me is that I am absolutely no different on this message board than I am in real life. That's a game for others to play. My stake president would not be shocked (or chagrined) at me calling you apostates filthy whores of Babylon. Indeed, he might just add a few adjectives to the mix.

It's no wonder you people couldn't hack it as Mormons. You don't have a freaking clue -- about the nature of God or His people. That's why it shocks you to have someone declare that Porter Rockwell is in heaven, and apostates go to hell.

Tator wrote:

According to Will he not concerned about his Stake President. From the OP:

Willy talking about his Stake President:

Quote:
No need now. I've pointed him to this message board and given him specific links to the threads in question. I think that's him I hear laughing right now from half way across town.

You see, my dear antagonist, the flaw in your plan to "expose" me is that I am absolutely no different on this message board than I am in real life. That's a game for others to play. My stake president would not be shocked (or chagrined) at me calling you apostates filthy whores of Babylon. Indeed, he might just add a few adjectives to the mix.

It's no wonder you people couldn't hack it as Mormons. You don't have a freaking clue -- about the nature of God or His people. That's why it shocks you to have someone declare that Porter Rockwell is in heaven, and apostates go to hell.

Bob Loblaw wrote:William Schryver wrote:

You might be interested in the fact that a couple people were once given the task of investigating the basis for the oft-repeated claim of my wanton vulgarity.

consiglieri wrote:Did we ever get the details from Will as to why a couple of people were given such a task, or by whom?

William Schryver wrote:
You didn't post "old posts" of mine. You posted a classic anti-mormon propaganda hit-piece that originated with Pig-in-a-Pokatator--a collection of out-of-context quotes liberally sprinkled with outright fabrications. No one except apostates and those well on their way have ever believed for a minute that I am the "foul mouthed, vulgar" caricature championed by you and the other whore's whelps here in the Perpetual Circle Jerk Suite™.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11811&p=294153&hilit=circle+jerk#p294153

William Schryver wrote: In any case, your continuing to call me a bald-faced liar is well noted (along with the other string of adjectives you have employed in the past and in your post above). Should you ever run into me in person, I guess you’d better hope I’m a “forgive and forget Christian,” huh? Otherwise you might find yourself having a knuckle sandwich for lunch.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12845&p=318666&hilit=knuckle#p318666

William Schryver wrote:Edit: KA was the one who blogged about her breast reduction surgery. It was hilarious. I laughed. I cried. I blew snot bubbles. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11836&p=294717#p294717