Follow the prophet?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Follow the prophet?

Post by _Runtu »

A good friend of mine is an attorney, and one of his LDS clients mentioned in passing that her husband (also active LDS) had taken a plural wife and that she was OK with it.

My friend asked if she knew that doing so jeopradized their church membership, she said that she understood that, but her husband felt that he needed to follow Joseph Smith's example by practicing polygamy.

He then asked her if she planned on making their arrangement public. She said no, they weren't because, to truly follow the prophet, her husband needed to practice polygamy in secret.

My friend swears to me that this really happened. I've heard of some pretzel-logic rationalizations, but this one is the best I've heard.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Ray A

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Ray A »

Runtu wrote:She said no, they weren't because, to truly follow the prophet, her husband needed to practice polygamy in secret.


I guess reading Mormon Enigma was no trial of faith for her.
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

Damn. That guy is a mack daddy.
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Gazelam »

Image

If its not sanctioned by the prophet, it is not bound and will work against them instead of for them. They are commiting adultery.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _John Larsen »

Gazelam wrote:If its not sanctioned by the prophet, it is not bound and will work against them instead of for them. They are commiting adultery.

How do you know it is not sanctioned by the prophet? Maybe the got a special calling. That is clearly part of the restored gospel--secret callings and secret rights. Just ask my wife's hair.
_Danna

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Danna »

Crickey. I wonder how many PH holders are out there JSjr-justified in keeping their plural marriages secret from the number one wife as well.
_Black Moclips
_Emeritus
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:46 am

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Black Moclips »

Well there are tons of old quotes by early leaders like Brigham Young that state that Celesital Marriage was required for the Celestial Kingdom, and by their definitions, Celetial Marriage=Polygamy. Those definitions changed over time with the discontinuance of the practice, but to those early leaders, it was essential for exaltation. So I can see how someone who is a die hard, ultra orthodox believer in Joseph Smith, can read a lot of that early history and come to the conclusion that yes, polygamy is required and the main church is out of the way. Couple that with the John Taylor revelation that polygamy would never be discontinued and wella!, you have people believing that they need to step up and sacrifice to do what is right.
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.”
_Yoda

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Yoda »

That's basically the premise of the "Big Love" show. The "modern" polygamous family is creating it's own Church. Should make for an interesting new season.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _harmony »

Runtu wrote:A good friend of mine is an attorney, and one of his LDS clients mentioned in passing that her husband (also active LDS) had taken a plural wife and that she was OK with it.


She doesn't love her husband then. No way any woman is "ok" with polygamy who loves her husband. She may participate, but she doesn't love her husband.

My friend asked if she knew that doing so jeopradized their church membership, she said that she understood that, but her husband felt that he needed to follow Joseph Smith's example by practicing polygamy.

He then asked her if she planned on making their arrangement public. She said no, they weren't because, to truly follow the prophet, her husband needed to practice polygamy in secret.


If that wasn't so pathetic, it would be hilariously funny. :lol:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Follow the prophet?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Runtu wrote:He then asked her if she planned on making their arrangement public. She said no, they weren't because, to truly follow the prophet, her husband needed to practice polygamy in secret.

Oh man, that is probably the single greatest thing I've heard all month. EPIC WIN.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply