When replying to a post it makes it much easier for the reader to identify who you're quoting by including the person's name in the quote. I'm picking this example at random:
I'm not sure why posters choose this:
The California Supreme Court is expected to uphold Prop 8 but allow the 18000 marriages that have been performed to remain legal.
Over this:
karl61 wrote:The California Supreme Court is expected to uphold Prop 8 but allow the 18000 marriages that have been performed to remain legal.
Is there a reason for this? I'm not singling out MDB either, as it also happens on MAD quite a lot. It means that readers don't have a clue who you're quoting, unless they go back and try to match the quote with a poster. This can lead a reader to sometimes ignore a response (since they wouldn't know who wrote what is being replied to, nor the context of the reply), unless they know who is being quoted. If a name is included in the quote reply, a reader who may not have been following the whole conversation can easily go back to the original quote to verify context. I understand, you know who you're quoting and replying to, but we don't always know.
Any chance of making it a little easier for all of us?
>
>
>