DiscussMormonism.com

The Lady Wisdom thread on the MAD Board:

Me too. After all we were formed "male and female" in their image... I don;t think HEavenly Father's image is that of a female ;)It is a pity that we do not talk about Her more in church.

All ancient female god worship was PAGAN folks. Still is. But what can you do when the entire LDS inviroment has devolved to a female orientation. Listen to the Conference talks and tell me that those guys are not trying to nurse the people on their male nipples. Turning gently from one to the other with cooing tones and soft whispers.

I wish she was recognized more as well. Joseph had a vision of her with Zebedee Coltrin and Sidney Rigdon. If she is important enough to be seen in vision then she is important enough to be recognized in Sacrament Meeting. Note: this is my personal opinion.Saint Sinner

eeeewww! The account of Joseph Smith stretching out his arms for Zeb and Sid to use for pillows as he opened up the heavens to show them the heavenly parents says they were Adam and Eve. Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father? Go read my theology thread. But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

Nightlion wrote:Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father?

So you reject Brigham Young's teachings on Adam/God?

But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

Why don't you do it?

Dr. Shades wrote:

Nightlion wrote:Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father?

So you reject Brigham Young's teachings on Adam/God?

The fact that Brigham was no great prophet saved his life for thirty years. Joseph's life was cut short, and in a hurry, so he could not correct all the silly notions about to fly.

Brigham said once he did not care if it was one way or another. What's up with that? Adam is an exalted man who was given a world to continue the seeds thereof with his wife, Eve, who, finishing all the hosts thereof, after obeying the first commandment to multiply and replenish the earth, was put into the Garden of Eden so that her conceptions could be multiplied and replenished. They were done making spirit bodies when Eve had no more conceptions possible.

We know that God made (resurrected) man in his own likeness and image, (glory) male and female. If God was a male and a female then there is no need to mention the differenciation of man. Right? So this proves that God is only male, as it must be, because God only creates and does all his works, by the word of his power, which is his Spirit. No sex. No wife. No female diety. D&C 29:30-31

God continues on his own eternal round, seperate and distinct from that which consists of exaltation of man and the continuation of the seeds. Two kinds of seeds both IN the world and OUT of the world.
D&C 132:30

But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

Why don't you do it?

They allow me to read only.

Heh..some of us aren't even allowed to read. LOL

Nightlion wrote:But what can you do when the entire LDS inviroment has devolved to a female orientation. Listen to the Conference talks and tell me that those guys are not trying to nurse the people on their male nipples. Turning gently from one to the other with cooing tones and soft whispers.

Remind me never to watch conference with you....your insights might disturb even me.

eeeewww! The account of Joseph Smith stretching out his arms for Zeb and Sid to use for pillows as he opened up the heavens to show them the heavenly parents says they were Adam and Eve. Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father? Go read my theology thread. But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

I don't recall Mount Olympus saying what you are saying.

The Nehor wrote:

Nightlion wrote:But what can you do when the entire LDS inviroment has devolved to a female orientation. Listen to the Conference talks and tell me that those guys are not trying to nurse the people on their male nipples. Turning gently from one to the other with cooing tones and soft whispers.

Remind me never to watch conference with you....your insights might disturb even me.

eeeewww! The account of Joseph Smith stretching out his arms for Zeb and Sid to use for pillows as he opened up the heavens to show them the heavenly parents says they were Adam and Eve. Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father? Go read my theology thread. But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

I don't recall Mount Olympus saying what you are saying.

Mount Olympus is not finished speaking. Just yesterday I was once agains astounded upon seeing something that I thought for two weeks mights be represented, then suddenly, I enlarge a snowy picture and there it is and blatantly so. No way, I said, no way. And a few days before this last one something new.

Nightlion wrote:Mount Olympus is not finished speaking. Just yesterday I was once agains astounded upon seeing something that I thought for two weeks mights be represented, then suddenly, I enlarge a snowy picture and there it is and blatantly so. No way, I said, no way. And a few days before this last one something new.

'Don't Panic' written in large friendly letters in the snow?

eeeewww! The account of Joseph Smith stretching out his arms for Zeb and Sid to use for pillows as he opened up the heavens to show them the heavenly parents says they were Adam and Eve. Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father? Go read my theology thread. But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

BY taught (non doctrinally) that Adam and Eve were begotten by Heavenly Father and Mother who came to the earth, partook of the physical fruits, and were thus able to conceive physical children. Thus, in his opinion, HF and HM are Adam and Eve Sr. and the ones who fell are Adam and Eve Jr.

There was never any such thing as Adam/God taught.

Nightlion wrote:

Dr. Shades wrote:Why don't you do it?

They allow me to read only.

Hello Nightlion,

Just Go over to MAD and create a Sockpuppet. After You have created a Sockpuppet there, then You can Post what You want there.

Anyway, I took a few Pictures of Mount Olympus when I lived in the Salt Lake Valley. I will have to scan them, in order for me to show these few Pictures around here.

bcspace wrote:

eeeewww! The account of Joseph Smith stretching out his arms for Zeb and Sid to use for pillows as he opened up the heavens to show them the heavenly parents says they were Adam and Eve. Eve is not the consort of Heavenly Father. Adam is not Heavenly Father. Adam is subject to Jesus Christ, how could he be his father? Go read my theology thread. But somebody please visit the Lost World and sound the clarion call to repent.

BY taught (non doctrinally) that Adam and Eve were begotten by Heavenly Father and Mother who came to the earth, partook of the physical fruits, and were thus able to conceive physical children. Thus, in his opinion, HF and HM are Adam and Eve Sr. and the ones who fell are Adam and Eve Jr.

There was never any such thing as Adam/God taught.

Yeah, he expressed his confusion on the point by saying he did not care if it were grandpa or what? Loosie goosie theology.