The Anti-Atheist Part 3
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm
The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Atheist are hate criminals
How is it with all their pop science and pulp sophistication and airs of fair play
the bottom line with the haters of God is a frenzied prejudice? Now that my new revelation of God's Art
has scientifically proven that God is part of our present culture his rights need to be addressed
and measures taken to proscribe all hate crimes targeted at him. Fair is fair.
Equal Rights For God
How is it with all their pop science and pulp sophistication and airs of fair play
the bottom line with the haters of God is a frenzied prejudice? Now that my new revelation of God's Art
has scientifically proven that God is part of our present culture his rights need to be addressed
and measures taken to proscribe all hate crimes targeted at him. Fair is fair.
Equal Rights For God
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Nightlion wrote:
Equal Rights For God
Equal rights for God? So much for the equal rights of the millions drowned in the flood. Equal rights for 8 people, if you believe that nonsense.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
John Larsen wrote:What about the Hindus?
All equality for every God able to enter the real world.
All the best luck to the Hindus?
Mount Olympus in Salt Lake City, Utah is to serve the world as a calling card that Jesus Christ is our Maker.
Any other god left any evidence of his existence for us to look upon and wonder and believe?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Ray A wrote:Nightlion wrote:
Equal Rights For God
Equal rights for God? So much for the equal rights of the millions drowned in the flood. Equal rights for 8 people, if you believe that nonsense.
After the billions of souls that come to live for hundreds of years each respectively before the flood destroyed them, they willfully chose to live viciously with one another. The ingress and egress of souls is the business of God. As the source of life he gets to set the parameters of its value and right to continue. Life does not take on an independent value separate from its source. Even when they want to deny God in order to rebel and take power unto themselves.
How vicious does our day have to become before a wise and loving God says that it is enough? Look to your own day when it shall again be like unto the days of Noah wherein only eight souls were saved by water. This time possibly only a handful again will continue into the new world after the plagues empty the world before it is consumed in sanctifying fire and raise up to a higher dimension.
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Nightlion wrote:... they willfully chose to live viciously with one another.
Gee, I only need to look at Mormon-related forums to see that, where if you criticise Mormonism you're told, "your days are numbered".
I mean, this is a sick religion.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Ray A wrote:Nightlion wrote:... they willfully chose to live viciously with one another.
Gee, I only need to look at Mormon-related forums to see that, where if you criticise Mormonism you're told, "your days are numbered".
I mean, this is a sick religion.
That is a rip and you know it. You will not fry because you criticize LDS anything.
The time was set before anyone lived a good or bad life.
You have to admit that your prejudice makes you resort to smearful hate mongering. You okay
living like that?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Nightlion stated in part here:
Life does not take on an independent value separate from its source.
First, your claimed God is merely assertion, one of many assertions. However, consider this assertion which you make. It makes your God fully and completely responsible for the “life” to which you refer.
Yet you claim:
Nightlion stated in part here:
Even when they want to deny God in order to rebel and take power unto themselves.
Who are “they”? They are the very ones whom you claim do not “take on an independent value separate from its source.” The “source” is assumed (by you) to be your God notion. If the first statement is correct (which is merely a claim absent evidence), the second must be false (which is also a claim absent evidence).
Hence, you must claim that those who “want to deny God” had no “independent value separate from its source.” Thus, you claim that your God is responsible for everything which takes place and which “they” (all the people) presumably created by your God can “not take on an independent value separate from its God source."
The contradiction is glairing and but one of the multiple absurdities of God constructions by those who make such constructions.
Keep in mind that the quoted words above are your words, your claims. Nothing was added or taken away from the two opposing claims.
Second, you claim “a wise and loving God.” It’s hardly the case for your God claim. How “loving” to destroy all human life except for a select few? It’s not loving. Your God as stated in your words is a tyrant, unforgiving, unkind, and clearly unloving God.
Yet you claim:
Nightlion stated in part here:
This time possibly only a handful again will continue into the new world after the plagues empty the world before it is consumed in sanctifying fire and raise up to a higher dimension.
Ah, “plagues” (whatever you regard as that) are orchestrated by your mean, hateful, selfish, and whimsical God. More absurdity of claim upon claim absent evidence for any of your claims.
You have constructed a most ugly, even childish God myth.
JAK
Life does not take on an independent value separate from its source.
First, your claimed God is merely assertion, one of many assertions. However, consider this assertion which you make. It makes your God fully and completely responsible for the “life” to which you refer.
Yet you claim:
Nightlion stated in part here:
Even when they want to deny God in order to rebel and take power unto themselves.
Who are “they”? They are the very ones whom you claim do not “take on an independent value separate from its source.” The “source” is assumed (by you) to be your God notion. If the first statement is correct (which is merely a claim absent evidence), the second must be false (which is also a claim absent evidence).
Hence, you must claim that those who “want to deny God” had no “independent value separate from its source.” Thus, you claim that your God is responsible for everything which takes place and which “they” (all the people) presumably created by your God can “not take on an independent value separate from its God source."
The contradiction is glairing and but one of the multiple absurdities of God constructions by those who make such constructions.
Keep in mind that the quoted words above are your words, your claims. Nothing was added or taken away from the two opposing claims.
Second, you claim “a wise and loving God.” It’s hardly the case for your God claim. How “loving” to destroy all human life except for a select few? It’s not loving. Your God as stated in your words is a tyrant, unforgiving, unkind, and clearly unloving God.
Yet you claim:
Nightlion stated in part here:
This time possibly only a handful again will continue into the new world after the plagues empty the world before it is consumed in sanctifying fire and raise up to a higher dimension.
Ah, “plagues” (whatever you regard as that) are orchestrated by your mean, hateful, selfish, and whimsical God. More absurdity of claim upon claim absent evidence for any of your claims.
You have constructed a most ugly, even childish God myth.
JAK
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Nightlion stated in this post:
You (Ray) have to admit that your prejudice makes you resort to smearful hate mongering.
Ray needs admit nothing of the sort. He has challenged your prejudice as a pundit of religious myth. Nightlion, you speak as if you have no “prejudice.” Every post demonstrates not merely prejudice but that you are so completely indoctrinated that you have no clue as to your own prejudice.
JAK
You (Ray) have to admit that your prejudice makes you resort to smearful hate mongering.
Ray needs admit nothing of the sort. He has challenged your prejudice as a pundit of religious myth. Nightlion, you speak as if you have no “prejudice.” Every post demonstrates not merely prejudice but that you are so completely indoctrinated that you have no clue as to your own prejudice.
JAK
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm
Re: The Anti-Atheist Part 3
Nightlion stated in this post:
After the billions of souls that come to live for hundreds of years each respectively before the flood destroyed them, they willfully chose to live viciously with one another.
You have stated and which I cited and quoted previously the following:
Life does not take on an independent value separate from its source.
No person can “take on an independent value…”
Hence, there can be no “willfully chose to live viciously with one another” as you contradictorily claim. Remember, you said the directly above. If that is your claim, you contradict your claim with another claim of “willfully chose…”
Absurdity, Nightlion!
JAK
After the billions of souls that come to live for hundreds of years each respectively before the flood destroyed them, they willfully chose to live viciously with one another.
You have stated and which I cited and quoted previously the following:
Life does not take on an independent value separate from its source.
No person can “take on an independent value…”
Hence, there can be no “willfully chose to live viciously with one another” as you contradictorily claim. Remember, you said the directly above. If that is your claim, you contradict your claim with another claim of “willfully chose…”
Absurdity, Nightlion!
JAK