Some of My Favorite Selek Quotes
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:02 pm
Of course. You also tend to deny that NAMBLA is a homosexual group, don't you? Tell me something- why is it that when a drunk driver kills somebody in a car crash, we hear shrill cries for restricting the rights of ALL drinkers, and when some nut kills people with a pistol, you and yours are up in arms to revise and/or abolish the 2nd Amendment rights of ALL gun owners, but when gays kidnap, molest, and murder children, we're expected to stop, think, and not judge all gays by the actions of thier brethren and ideological fellows.
Selek May 28, 2009 http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 489&st=160
Apparently, 'this' incident isn't quite as isolated as you are wont to pretend- but your accusation is very revealing. Thank you for the admission that gays consider simply holding an opinion contrary to thier agenda to be a crime on par with child-molestation and murder. --
Selek May 28, 2009 http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 489&st=160
Darin, a far better person than you or I can hope to be has asked me to cut you some slack- so I'll clarify one point and walk away. I was not- either implicitly or explicitly- accusing you personally of engaging in or advocating on behalf of, child rape or murder. My point was- and remains- that for every tale of persecution and atrocity against gays that you can produce, reference, or invent, I can find one commited by gays. Your desperate need to maintain the victim status of gays is a manifestation of what I call the Jesse Jackson Principle. Victimhood is the only moral 'highground' your ideology can claim. Admission of wrong-doing on the part of your fellow travellers reduces that advantage, and as it is the only one you have, you are understandably loathe to part with it. That having been said, your approach is intellectually and rhetorically dishonest- and any victory you gain by dishonest means will be forever tainted- not to mention the corrosive effect it will have on your mind and soul. So...this is goodbye. Until you get your moral compass pointing back to north, I will have nothing further to do with you. And no, I don't believe your orientation is the particular lodestone skewing your path.
Selek -- May 28, 2009 http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 489&st=160
Bullying won't need to be taught in the home- children will be able to learn it first hand by watching the homosexuals and thier political lackeys demonize and terrorise anyone who dares think for themselves instead of kow-towing at the altar of deviancy and political correctness.
Selek - June 15 2009 http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 0&start=20
When the Lord began working with and through Joseph Smith, he did not feel the need it reiterate the simple things like 'Thou shalt not kill' or 'Thou shalt not steal'- these basic principles were well understood and there was no need to hand them down again. The same holds true for the simple commandment, 'A buggerer or a pederast thou shalt not be.' Up until the recent push for the legitimization of homosexuality, that prohibition was clearly understood as well.
Selek - June 1, 2009 - http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... type=posts
Thank you for the admission that gays consider simply holding an opinion contrary to thier agenda to be a crime on par with child-molestation and murder.
Selek May 28, 2009
Darin, you are a demogague and a fraud- you claim to decry religious persecution and not two posts later link to an anti-Mormon propaganda piece in order to drum up sympathy for your cause. You claim to champion religious liberty while advocating that people be punished for advocating religious views contrary to your own. You consistently play down homosexual misbehaviors, make excuses for gays who harass and assault church-goers who don't endorse your political agenda, and willfully misrepresent facts to bolster the indefensible. And when you're called on it, you offer a disingenuous, 'Who, me?' For all your charm- and you are very gifted in that regard- the doubletalk, double standard, and do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do has gotten tiresome. Peddle your snake oil somewhere else.
Selek - May 28, 2009
Homosexual dalliances do not meet the same qualifiers to be considered 'marriage'- however many legal fictions the activists try to invent. It matters not that you can get an activist judge to call a hen a rooster, it remains a rooster. Your analogy also suffers from the simple fact that there is no law, no movement, no push to prevent gays from calling themselves 'married'. They can play house, dress up in Mommy's wedding dress and mascara and hold all the ceremonies and pretend all they like. We just refuse to let them use the power of the State to force us to play along.
Selek - May 28, 2009
NO ONE HERE has advocated for treating homosexuals with disrespect or denying them thier due civil rights.
Selek -- May 26, 2009
QUOTE(california boy @ May 26 2009, 08:14 AM) *
Looks to me that the gay protests against the church for their attitudes towards gays were well deserved. There is certainly little sign of treating gays as equal in this group of Mormons posting here. Lets just continue to discriminate against them, bully them in schools, deny them employment just because they are gay beat them up on the streets, and prevent them from anything else we can possibly get away with.
It is an eternal verity that we shall be judged by the same standard with which we judge others- and you have just damned yourself. You have borne false witness against the Saints, you have called evil good, and good evil, and you have condemned the just and the innocent. No faithful Saint has advocated the things you have claimed. None has called for violence against homosexuals, and none has attempted to justify crimes against them. You are a deciever, a fraud, and a child of Satan- and lest you repent of your lies, shall have no forgiveness in this life or the next.
Selek -- May 26, 2009
It is unfair and patently un-Christian for you to paint all Mormons with the most unfavorable brush available. Not Quite- you need to walk away. You're hostility towards Catholics is becoming extremely tiresome. That you had bad experiences and no longer agree with thier theology is no excuse for you slandering all Catholics. That sort of behavior is best reserved to the ignorant, the bigoted, and the ungodly. You're none of the above, so please act like it. As to those who snarled at Fuller, even I- he who had his sense of humor surgically removed to make room for more ego- could tell he was joking. We welcome and appreciate our Catholic posters- and only flog them when they misbehave.
Selek May 3, 2009
CeeBoo, I want to say welcome and that I've enjoyed your posts thus far. In the interests of fairness, I think it must needs be stated that these folks are the extreme fringe and that they are 'Christian' only in the same sense that the Pharisees were 'Jewish'- they've got the outer symbolism, but none of the spiritual substance. Thier 'Christian' covering is merely camouflage for a deeper and more radical hatred- and perhaps even self-loathing. If they weren't protesting us, they'd find another outlet for thier venom. Like most performance art, they're far more concerned with being the center of attention than being right. Most LDS have caught on that these folks are just praying we'll break down and meet stupidity with stupidity- it justifies thier prejudices and allows them to use the media to exploit the incident- the coverage is invariably the poor courageous protestor standing up for free speech- and never a word about who or how the incident was provoked. Keep an eye on the news regarding Church pageants during the Spring and Summer, and you'll see what we're talking about. If you've got the time and interest, you might even drop by one of the pageants- the shows themselves are worth attending, and the clown show before the curtain goes up makes a dandy intellectual aperitif. Heck, you might get lucky and witness a repeat of the AShaf Bathroom Conspiracy and Chorus line.
June 15, 2009
Sleepy, it's posts like this that make it so very difficult to take you seriously. How is shrieking at a new bride on her wedding day, calling her a whore, and throwing urine on her to disrupt the wedding pictures 'expressing an alternate religious viewpoint'? How is shrieking at children, telling them they're going to hell, and calling them 'children of Satan' a Christian act? I understand that being a rabid ex-Mormon and a practicing occultist gives you a unique point of view, but surely it doesn't exempt you from basic standards of decency and intellectual honesty, now does it?
June 15, 2009
Of course-being closeted and unmarried is the source of all gay ills, right Darin? Open, avowed homosexuals never abandon thier wives and children in order to pursue thier lusts, right? Open, avowed, committed-to-each-other-in-a-long-term-relationship homosexuals would never kidnap and rape to death an eleven year old boy while you and a sympathetic media looked the other way, now would they? Apparently embracing and feeding one's impulses has some fairly disastrous consequences for innocent bystanders- especially young children. --
Selek May 28, 2009 -- http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 489&st=140
Enjoy.
