DiscussMormonism.com

Yahoo Bot wrote:But, now I turn to Kishkumen, whose anti-YB rhetoric is ratcheting up as the days go by, the constant allegation of "lying" when there isn't any example of such. I feel sorry for K, for the flipping we see between nice Jason and viturperative Kiskhumen, a truly split personality. One is somewhat committed to the gospel of Jesus, the other is committed to defame and injure. One is upbeat, one is depressed. One is helpful, one is spiteful. Of course, he must see by now that his on-line persona is a window to his realness, his schizophrenia, his descent into darker stuff. I hope he comes back. The Church can use him.

Runtu wrote:Who is Jason? Just curious. Last I checked, Kishkumen is not any Jason I know of.

Runtu wrote:

Yahoo Bot wrote:But, now I turn to Kishkumen, whose anti-YB rhetoric is ratcheting up as the days go by, the constant allegation of "lying" when there isn't any example of such. I feel sorry for K, for the flipping we see between nice Jason and viturperative Kiskhumen, a truly split personality. One is somewhat committed to the gospel of Jesus, the other is committed to defame and injure. One is upbeat, one is depressed. One is helpful, one is spiteful. Of course, he must see by now that his on-line persona is a window to his realness, his schizophrenia, his descent into darker stuff. I hope he comes back. The Church can use him.

Who is Jason? Just curious. Last I checked, Kishkumen is not any Jason I know of.

Yahoo Bot wrote:

Runtu wrote:Who is Jason? Just curious. Last I checked, Kishkumen is not any Jason I know of.

The poster known as "Jason" (inactive) is the same as Kish.

Yahoo Bot wrote:Ahh. Some interesting observations above. My response.

I never had any contact with Eric's father about any of his postings on this board until his father, a client of mine, called me to ask about what he had read for himself. There were others on this board, whose names I know, who alerted Eric's dad. Not little old me, although I made an attempt to link to an Eric thread, but I had an obsolete email for Eric's dad and then didn't pursue when it bounced.

Eric did a lot more than post my wife's picture on his avatar. He contacted my firm's partners on three occasions. In the first post he used the phrase "child molester." In the third post he accused me of being a "gay basher". Of course, my firm has nothing to do with my posting. He contacted the state bar twice and in the last instance, reported to this board that an investigation file had been opened against me due to his complaints. My connections with the bar led me to the right person who reported that the complaints were summarily ignored and or rejected as frivolous and malicious. Seems the state bar is used to such.

Having said that, I want to remain neutral about Eric. I've followed his lawsuit and think there might be something there, but who knows. I certainly don't want to upset his parents and have them think that I oppose Eric's activities. Other than defensive measures I do, I really wish him the best and hope that on a better day I can help him.

As far as Beastie is concerned, I merely repeatedly quoted her own words, which contained a threat. She misconstrued a post I made as being hateful to women; I had called Scratch a "she" when I was developing a theory, which I still hold, that Scratch was really a committee. Beastie took my one-liner as an indictment of womanhood. You can read it for yourself.

But, now I turn to Kishkumen, whose anti-YB rhetoric is ratcheting up as the days go by, the constant allegation of "lying" when there isn't any example of such. I feel sorry for K, for the flipping we see between nice Jason and viturperative Kiskhumen, a truly split personality. One is somewhat committed to the gospel of Jesus, the other is committed to defame and injure. (I'm not talking about me; he knows who I am but doesn't try to hurt my career.) One is upbeat, one is depressed. One is helpful, one is spiteful. Of course, he must see by now that his on-line persona is a window to his realness, his schizophrenia, his descent into darker stuff. I hope he comes back. The Church can use him.

Yahoo Bot wrote:But, now I turn to Kishkumen, whose anti-YB rhetoric is ratcheting up as the days go by, the constant allegation of "lying" when there isn't any example of such. I feel sorry for K, for the flipping we see between nice Jason and viturperative Kiskhumen, a truly split personality. One is somewhat committed to the gospel of Jesus, the other is committed to defame and injure. (I'm not talking about me; he knows who I am but doesn't try to hurt my career.) One is upbeat, one is depressed. One is helpful, one is spiteful. Of course, he must see by now that his on-line persona is a window to his realness, his schizophrenia, his descent into darker stuff. I hope he comes back. The Church can use him.

Kishkumen wrote:
News to me! Jason who again?

Yahoo Bot wrote:The poster known as "Jason" (inactive) is the same as Kish. Like a Greek tragedy, with troups of actors coming and going in waves, or like wings at a hockey game, it used to be that Jason would come, Kish would go, and vice versa. We now just have Kish, the angry opponent of Dr. Peterson; Kish, the master of rhetoric having been trained in the classics by the Lord's university; Kish, the dweller-in-front-of-the-PC-all-day-board-denizen; Kish, the ultimate example of wasted time and life; Kish, the shadow of Jason.

Kishkumen wrote:
LOL. Actually, I don't try to hurt anyone's career. And, I have been very consistent on the mendacious quality of your participation here. Very consistent.