Page 1 of 4

Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:12 am
by _mormonmessages

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:46 pm
by _rocket
All I did was write a review and this guy's come after me ever since. He's harmless.

I do find the following odd statement he perpetuates on this website (it keeps changing), as true: "Mr. Crockett completely discredits Mr. Bagley using Juanita Brooks as one reference to do so. " The fellow is an extremely poor writer. And repeatedly violates copyright laws.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:34 pm
by _karl61
is it true that goods were taken from the massacre and put in the Bishops store house; that Brigham Young rode in a new buggy taken from the massacre. Those were some of the things that leaped out at me when I read that page.

Historians do say that in Missouri Mormon raiders did burn down houses and bring goods back to the Bishops store house so if it is true it is nothing new regarding the LDS Church. I read where that was the last straw for some and they left the LDS church after that.

This is not new - The Hebrews took towns and the "booty". It was their land anyways. God gave it to them.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:39 pm
by _EAllusion
karl61 wrote: The Hebrews took towns and the "booty".
Heh.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:50 pm
by _karl61
EAllusion wrote:
karl61 wrote: The Hebrews took towns and the "booty".
Heh.


The gold, silver, live stock, people, etc.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:51 pm
by _EAllusion
karl61 wrote:
The gold, silver, live stock, people, etc.


I was laughing at the double entendre.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:06 pm
by _karl61
EAllusion wrote:
karl61 wrote:
The gold, silver, live stock, people, etc.


I was laughing at the double entendre.


whats a "double entendre"? is that a double meaning.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:16 pm
by _solomarineris
The gold, silver, live stock, people, etc.
That, my friend ain't the best part.
I want the Virgins.

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:50 pm
by _karl61
you want the virgins so you can't commit adultery. But you got to marry them so just have a close friend say a little something joining you two and you are again married

Re: Our own rcrocket attacks Will Bagley?

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:01 am
by _moksha
I was thinking that it would be wise for apologists to not defend something like a massacre. When one's primary purpose is to defend the Church, concomitantly defending evil that Church members have done, makes further apologetics much less credible. Sort of like they have no compass to distinguish between good and bad. Why defend the bad? A mea culpa seems much more honest, together with a reminder that this was a horrendous aberration.

Just a friendly thought...