What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Uncle Dale wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote:What constitutes breaking the LoC?



Having any sexual thoughts, actions or unrepentant desires,
other than missionary-position intercourse, with the opposite sex,
while the female is fertile, (and both participants are praying to
God for the conception of a child).

All else is breaking the Law of Perfect Chastity.

In other words, ask yourself how Eloheim conducts His sex life,
and if yours falls short of that in any way whatever, you are
not living up to His perfect standards.

Query" Who does Eloheim pray to, as He and his wives have intercourse?
I assume it is to "Heavenly Grandfather" -- whose holy name slips my mind.

UD


Oh horsepucky Dale. This post is really beneath you.
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _gramps »

I think your signature crosses the line.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _Brackite »

gramps wrote:I think your signature crosses the line.


LOL! :lol:
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _Gazelam »

Pirate,

Anything touching or going passed second base. Hopefully, despite your being british, your familiar with colloquial american baseball references in regards to human intimacy.

Gaz
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _harmony »

Jason Bourne wrote:[


I thought it was pretty funny!
:lol:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _moksha »

Tchild wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote: Well, for Mormon leaders, you are supposed to confess your sexual sins down to the "light petting" stage, ...


Yes, repeat that confession again, but this time real slowly and with more detail...
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _moksha »

Gazelam wrote:Pirate,

Anything touching or going passed second base. Hopefully, despite your being british, your familiar with colloquial american baseball references in regards to human intimacy.

Gaz


Gaz, could you use cricket references instead?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Tchild
_Emeritus
Posts: 2437
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:44 am

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _Tchild »

Yes, repeat that confession again, but this time real slowly and with more detail

Just saying the word "petting", gets me all riled up. The associations and feelings (and fond, fond memories) with the word are too pleasing to these, mine senses. Maybe the church should ban that word as too verbally pornographic?

They should call it light vileness, or maybe, minor lasciviousness. Perhaps even mutual lewdness or something more associated with a criminal misdemeanor so that the person associates bad, not good, with sexuality. :lol:
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _krose »

Sethbag wrote:You and I laugh, but a ward mission leader of mine when I was on my mission told me of a companion he'd had on his mission who would shower in his garments, removing one arm or one leg at a time to wash them. He'd towel off one part of his body at a time and put on a fresh garment over that area before removing the other wet garment, and so forth. He took his garments pretty darn seriously. ;-)

The practice of bathing only parts of the body at a time so as to avoid ever getting totally naked, was a very common practice in the earlier days of the church, down to my grandparents' days. But I haven't heard of more recent practitioners, in spite of the fact that it would be so much easier now, with smaller-format, 2-piece garms.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_John Waite
_Emeritus
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:45 pm

Re: What constitutes breaking the LoC? N/T

Post by _John Waite »

Imwashingmypirate wrote:N/T

Why are you asking this question?

Are you trying to set a point you can go to with your boyfriend, and then you figure you'll stop right there and go no farther?

If so, I'll let you in on a little secret: when it comes to sexual arousal, things have a nasty way of getting out of hand, and before you realize what happened, you wake up one morning and you're no longer the virgin you were the night before. So go ahead and push things to the limit, telling yourself that you'll stop at such and such a line and go no farther. It will probably work two or three times. Maybe even five or six. But I guarantee you it won;t work forever. Eventually you'll feel an overhwelming urge to finish what you started. So you will. And that will be that.
Post Reply