I'll Be There

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_John Waite
_Emeritus
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:45 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _John Waite »

liz3564 wrote:
John Waite wrote:She dumped her husband. Her new found sense of herself just wasn't compatable with him anymore.



Runtu and Shades have been polite. I won't be quite as polite. Quit being an asshole. Kimberly Ann is one of the nicest people on this board. Back off!

I believe I can be and say anything I'd like, thank you.

As for Kimberly Ann, I do not doubt that she is nice as can be. Especially to her current lover.

That does not change the fact that she is now a card carrying member of this wicked and adultrous generation.

But then that pretty much characterizes most of you on this message board.

I know that it riles you people to hear it said, but the fact is that I have yet to meet a single apostate or alienated LDS whose disaffection from the church was not concurrent with personal sin of some sort or another. Eventually it will all be laid bare for everyone to see. Until then I expect the denials to continue.
_Tiktaalik
_Emeritus
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:17 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _Tiktaalik »

John Waite wrote:I believe I can be and say anything I'd like, thank you.

[blah blah blah]



It's obvious that you're a security pass-wearing member of this imbecilic and duplicitous era.

But then that pretty much characterises anyone who presumes to know The Truth™ based on the incoherent mumblings of some Bronze Age goatherders and seeks to impose The Truth™ on everyone they come in contact with.

Did Elohim tell you directly to come on this board and berate random people or did you just come up with that little gem of an idea on your own?
_Yoda

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _Yoda »

John Waite, you don't know anything about Kim's personal life! You are just throwing out rumors, and stating them as fact. Has Kim ever publicly stated that she left her husband? That she has a lover? That she has committed adultery?

The answer to all of these questions would be "no", you slimeball!

Kim has kids. I don't appreciate you throwing around slanderous slurs about her.

If you want to refer to her as an apostate, and continue to call her to repentance like a goofball on that basis, then fine. But DO NOT continue to insinuate that she committed adultery.

You are an embarassment to the LDS Church.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Dear Mr. Waite,

You exemplify for many a lurker why it is that Mormonism does not "perfect" anyone in the least. Your rumormongering is terribly sinful. I recommend you take a good hard look in the mirror before you behave the way you do. You owe that woman an apology, and you need to see your Bishop in order to start the repentance process.

Very Respectfully,

Doctor CamNC4Me
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _TAK »

John Waite wrote:[That does not change the fact that she is now a card carrying member of this wicked and adultrous generation.

But then that pretty much characterizes most of you on this message board.

I know that it riles you people to hear it said, but the fact is that I have yet to meet a single apostate or alienated LDS whose disaffection from the church was not concurrent with personal sin of some sort or another. Eventually it will all be laid bare for everyone to see. Until then I expect the denials to continue.


Ahh.. moronism perfected thought.. go f* youself..
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it.
Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010


_________________
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _Pokatator »

John Waite, are you married to Helen?

Before you comment again may I suggest you go to Helen Waite.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _Dr. Shades »

John Waite wrote:But then that pretty much characterizes most of you on this message board.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

I know that it riles you people to hear it said, but the fact is that I have yet to meet a single apostate or alienated LDS whose disaffection from the church was not concurrent with personal sin of some sort or another.

Guess what? All active, believing LDS are also concurrent with personal sin of some sort or other. That's why you guys take the sacrament.

Eventually it will all be laid bare for everyone to see. Until then I expect the denials to continue.

Wishful thinking on your part. Since you have no way of knowing anything about her personal life, this rumor-spreading can only be chalked up to an attempt at childish revenge for her having the temerity to distance herself from your church.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

John Waite, you are correct that I am sometimes wicked, though I try not to be. I do honestly attempt to do right by folks, as I'm sure you do, but I screw up every now and again because I'm only human. But you aren't correct in calling me adulterous. It's simply not true.

Ms. Nobody, I did eat my hat, but like most things I eat, it was sauteed in just a little butter and garlic. It wasn't half bad!

To the folks who defended me: Thank You. You are all very kind.

Kimberly
_John Waite
_Emeritus
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:45 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _John Waite »

KimberlyAnn wrote:John Waite, you are correct that I am sometimes wicked, though I try not to be. I do honestly attempt to do right by folks, as I'm sure you do, but I screw up every now and again because I'm only human. But you aren't correct in calling me adulterous. It's simply not true.

Ms. Nobody, I did eat my hat, but like most things I eat, it was sauteed in just a little butter and garlic. It wasn't half bad!

To the folks who defended me: Thank You. You are all very kind.

Kimberly

You think just because you divorced the poor guy it makes it kosher. That doesn't surprise me. I"m sure it helps you sleep better at night and also shows your children how an *upright* adultress should do things. Good job. You should be proud.
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: I'll Be There

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

Sounds like John Waite has had some painful experience in his own life that he needs to project onto others. Tell us, John: are you harassing Kimberly because you cheated on your wife, or is it because your inadequacies led your wife to leave you for another man?
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
Post Reply