Re: I quit the Church!!!
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:30 am
Too scared to answer my questions?
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
why me wrote:You are showing your own intolerance as an exmo when you claim that there is no middle way. Former TBMs who may have been most judgemental of less actives or inactives usually keep the same deameanor as an exmo and show intolerance toward inactive people who defend the lds church.
Over on the postmorg, they are the most judgemental group you ever would want to meet. I know that they gave you hugs over there but they are very judgemental as exmormons are on their board.
The mantra that there is no middle way is just wishful thinking since many could not find their own middle way as members. But it does exist. There are many inactives or semiactives that are not hostile against the lds church and would defend it, if they were given the chance.
Whoa. That is basically the same thing I said to you years ago.. well except the part about the fat ass.. you don't strike me as a lard butt.Ray A wrote:why me wrote:You are showing your own intolerance as an exmo when you claim that there is no middle way. Former TBMs who may have been most judgemental of less actives or inactives usually keep the same deameanor as an exmo and show intolerance toward inactive people who defend the lds church.
Over on the postmorg, they are the most judgemental group you ever would want to meet. I know that they gave you hugs over there but they are very judgemental as exmormons are on their board.
The mantra that there is no middle way is just wishful thinking since many could not find their own middle way as members. But it does exist. There are many inactives or semiactives that are not hostile against the lds church and would defend it, if they were given the chance.
When you get off your hypocritical and habit-fattened ass and actually attend Church, pay tithing, keep the Word of Wisdom, and do all that is requried of you - then I might take you seriously.
Ray A wrote:We learn slowly, and painfully, PP.
Ray A wrote:why me wrote:Well, I don't know. Heavenly Father is a man and as spoken quite often through men...just look at the Bible. Was Paul speaking as a man or was he speaking for god? And Jesus was a man. The Bible is full of male voices acting in the name of Jesus or of god. You just need to get used to it. Your issue is with god and not with the brethern.
One day you're going to wake up and wonder why in hell you ever defended Mormons.
In the meantime - happy delusions.
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Fine Walmart, here is your chance.
Tell us YOUR middle ground of Mormonism.
Do you attend church services AT ALL? No
Pay ANY TITHES? no
Attend temple? no
Do home teaching? no
Have home teachers over? yes
Married? no In the temple? yes
Wear gaments? no
How many years ago did you do any of the above? don' remember
Do you drink alcohol? no
Smoke?
Drink coffee or tea? no
View porn? what is porn?
Masturbate? solitary sex?
Please be candid and honest. It's not like any one on these boards knows you in real life.
why me wrote:It would be great if someone would prove the Book of Mormon false. I would celebrate that happening. No one should be living a fraud. But that hasn't happened yet. Wishful thinking on the part of the antimormons just doesn't cut it. Until the book is proven false, I am under no delusions.
Nevo wrote:Ray A wrote:I think this is quite reasonable. As one poster noted on BCC, Elder Holland's denunciation of Book of Mormon detractors in his recent conference talk "focused explicitly on divinity, not historicity per se. The fiery arrows directed at the fraud-criers sailed passed the inspired fiction crowd unscathed."
I think it's a case of "in essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things charity."