bcspace wrote:Funny how quickly Obama adopts the Bush program because it's the right thing to do.....Of course you obviously don't have any clue about LDS doctrine on the matter of war and cherry picking a few verses doesn't not give the complete picture. Among other things, GBH himself in conference put his stamp of approval on the Iraq war and the Church published it making it doctrine that one must now factor into the mix.
I remember that talk. I do not think it says what you think it says.
Pre-emptive war against Iran is totaly justified within and without the gospel as Iran is already at war by proxy and you have a terrorist (doesn't matter which one) supporting nation with a wmd program just as Iraq in a "post 9/11 world".
14 And when they had sworn by all that had been forbidden them by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, that they would go up unto their enemies to battle, and avenge themselves of the blood of their brethren, behold the voice of the Lord came unto me, saying:
15 Vengeance is mine, and I will repay; and because this people repented not after I had delivered them, behold, they shall be cut off from the face of the earth.
16 And it came to pass that I utterly refused to go up against mine enemies; and I did even as the Lord had commanded me; and I did stand as an idle witness to manifest unto the world the things which I saw and heard, according to the manifestations of the Spirit which had testified of things to come.
The beginning of the end of the Nephites. Sound familiar?
My main concern is that Obama will make the same or worse initial mistakes as Bush in that he won't go for an all out victory. Bush was right in every way and at least he tried to do the right thing. After the defeat of Obamacare, Barak Hussein is simply looking to wag the dog.
You're kidding me....you think Obama wants another war?
I think the proper strategy is to either:
1) Have a nationwide Thunder Run in which we decimate Iran's government, military industrial complex (along with the nuke program), and oil producing facilities (because they have been misused and because it would weaken China). We occupied those sites and search for others until they are all destroyed to our satisfaction. Then we withdraw after a couple of months or so after arming and training the various anti-regime groups and contain the mess from Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran will then become yet another death trap for Islamic radicals and that has played in our favor given our experience in Iraq.
So become completely ruthless....sounds like the right moral choice?
2) Simply spark a civil war and destabilization by arming, training, and inserting anti regime forces, but that is less of a sure thing especially when it comes to getting rid of the nuclear program.
Yeah, our involvement in what amounted to civil wars has gone so well in the past. Korea, Vietnam, all total victories. Then there are all the dissident groups and states we backed up to repel communism. People like Saddam and those wonderful South American dictators.
3) Give Israel what they need to make heavy and continuous strategic strikes and allow them to establish Greater Israel.
You want Israel to become even more of an occupying army? Hey, maybe we can even build Israeli settlements throughout the area. That's worked well in calming conquered arabs.
I would certainly add the real threat of the complete destruction of Mecca, Medina, Al Asqua, and several lesser shrines and holy sites and carry it out one by one if any one of those nations or terrorist organizations so much as raises their heads off the ground from their grovelling in obescience to us.
You want them to grovel? Pride before the fall and all that. You want to wipe out the holy shrines of Islam? Are you trying to provoke World War III? That would create a fifth column all over Europe and North America. Moderate and liberal Muslims would NEVER forget what we did. We'd create extremists. Europe would (rightly) abandon us and over 20% of the world's population would declare a jihad against us and many, many more would despise us and unite against us terrified we might do the same to them. This is how you want to win?
It's time to end the nuanced approach, stop p u s s y footing around, and achieve total victory. Worried about oil prices as a result? We should have become independent of foreign oil decades ago both Republicans and Democrats having plenty of opportunity to achieve this.
Yes, bullying the entire world has worked so well. How much military expansion do you want? Total victory is what? The annihilation and subjugation of a fifth of the world's population? There was an Austrian tramp a few decades back with a similar plan. You may have heard of him.
And I think perhaps we ought to take the liberals at their word and actually do what they have been erroneously claiming the wars been been all about and take some oil for ourselves. lol
Loot and pillage as a method of creating a lasting peace? It's original; I'll give it that.
Perhaps we should take a note from El Guapo's band and "Steal the Women and Rape the Horses."
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo