Why are there not more apologists on this site?

[_RockSlider]

for what it's worth, I'm feeling a bit pissy towards Gadianton and Scratch and they way they treat people

[_Redefined]

Mods, I need a response from you. If it meets the above, I'm ready to discuss it.

I know it may be of no consolation, but I read that and I didn't have an inkling who he was talking about. I even questioned if he might have meant myself, but given the realization that DCP and I have never corresponded privately, I was able to rule myself out. ;P Otherwise there are a handful of women posters on here that it could have been. Not a definitive finger point. Sorry! :(

[_Jersey Girl]

Moderator approval for what? Discussing it? I'm just telling you I'm not going to delete it, since it was written on another board. If Shades wants to override, that is his perogative.

Moderator approval for discussing it and posting the PM exchanges that Daniel and others have alluded to.

[_Jersey Girl]

Here are Daniel's MA&D comments once again:

I've kept cordial relations with a few there, and have communicated with them from time to time via private e-mails. (One of them, though, went ballistic a while back about something I'd written privately to her and exploded rather oddly on the message board itself, so I guess she's no longer a welcoming contact! Which is fine, though a tad disappointing.)

The above is a distortion of fact, harmony. It is a distortion of fact that maligns me. My request for a Mod ruling was requested so that I could make an effort to challenge that distortion in full public view and within the rules of this board.

Does that make sense?

[_Redefined]

Does that make sense?

I get what you're saying now!

P.S. sorry for all the "noise" ya'll, I hope this forum doesn't have a noise/substance ratio. . . at least go easy on me for my first offense here. . . my excuse: I've just downed two 20 ounce mugs of coffee! I'll be here all night! :)

[_Jersey Girl]

Does that make sense?

I get what you're saying now!

P.S. sorry for all the "noise" ya'll, I hope this forum doesn't have a noise/substance ratio. . . at least go easy on me for my first offense here. . . my excuse: I've just downed two 20 ounce mugs of coffee! I'll be here all night! :)

If this forum had a nose/substance ratio standard, this forum wouldn't exist.
:-)

[_Eric]

Moderator approval for discussing it and posting the PM exchanges that Daniel and others have alluded to.

I think you should post the exchange, Jersey Girl.

[_harmony]

Moderator approval for discussing it and posting the PM exchanges that Daniel and others have alluded to.

Daniel did not allude to any PM exchanges in a post on this board. There is no rule that covers posts made on another board that allude to PM exchanges that take place in PM land on this board. I cannot make up the rules. That's up to Shades.

The rules are not clear if Person X in a PM exchange has alluded to the PM exchange and Person Y on another board, if Person Y can take that as tacit permission to expose said PM exchange on this board. The rule only covers posts here. So defending here against a post on another board about a PM exchange here is not covered. So that's also up to Shades to rule on.

[_Jersey Girl]

Moderator approval for discussing it and posting the PM exchanges that Daniel and others have alluded to.

I think you should post the exchange, Jersey Girl.

I fully intend to. Under normal circumstances, the PM's that I receive are cordial. The exchanges in question were not cordial. They were responses to comments that I had made on this board by a poster who was well able to engage them on this board. Some of the comments made to me were attacking, condescending, shaming, obnoxious and otherwise disrespectful.

I have no problem whatsoever with anyone who strongly disagrees with whatever I post on this board. I have major problems being attacked behind the scenes and then being mischaracterized by the person who did it.

[_Jersey Girl]

Moderator approval for discussing it and posting the PM exchanges that Daniel and others have alluded to.

Daniel did not allude to any PM exchanges in a post on this board. There is no rule that covers posts made on another board that allude to PM exchanges that take place in PM land on this board. I cannot make up the rules. That's up to Shades.

The rules are not clear if Person X in a PM exchange has alluded to the PM exchange and Person Y on another board, if Person Y can take that as tacit permission to expose said PM exchange on this board. The rule only covers posts here. So defending here against a post on another board about a PM exchange here is not covered. So that's also up to Shades to rule on.

harmony,

I don't think you understand what I've stated here. I honestly don't.