DiscussMormonism.com

LOL!!!

Gawd, some Mormons really have a hard-on for that word "bash," don't they? Pity they define it as "merely disagreeing with."

Morans.

God, you ain't kidding. Those fools over there are probably eating cookies and drinking fruit punch as they contemplate how righteous they are while the rest of us get ready to burn in the fires of hell.

Mormonism is for brains that want to be sanitized and controlled. Mormonism is all about judging others and making yourself feel more special.

Paul O

While I agree with the general response of this board to that one, I cannot help but feel a little bit of something for that organization. I met my lovely wife in their chat room and have been quite pleased with her ever since. (We were also the ones responsible for creating the biannual meetups) So I guess they aren't all bad.

Spurven Ten Sing wrote:While I agree with the general response of this board to that one, I cannot help but feel a little bit of something for that organization. I met my lovely wife in their chat room and have been quite pleased with her ever since. (We were also the ones responsible for creating the biannual meetups) So I guess they aren't all bad.

That's a nice story -- thanks for sharring. The board isn't a bad place to be if one is faithful LDS and unwilling to listen to complaints about their religion.

Paul O

Dwight Frye wrote:Gawd, some Mormons really have a hard-on for that word "bash," don't they? Pity they define it as "merely disagreeing with."

Without sensations behind their nipples telling them right from wrong, or a constant belief that they are being persecuted - Mormons wouldn't have anything to confirm their faith.

Infymus wrote:Without sensations behind their nipples telling them right from wrong, or a constant belief that they are being persecuted - Mormons wouldn't have anything to confirm their faith.

Without the protection of legal threats, you would be even more of an Internet embarrassment than you already are.

Wow, Moksha! You've been on there forever and I thought you were always very level headed.

I got warned once for stating that I felt D&C 132 was false doctrine. I may have also intimated that we wouldn't really know if the current prophet was practicing polygamy or not. They didn't really like that.

I pretty avoid that place now.

just me wrote:Wow, Moksha! You've been on there forever and I thought you were always very level headed.

I got warned once for stating that I felt D&C 132 was false doctrine. I may have also intimated that we wouldn't really know if the current prophet was practicing polygamy or not. They didn't really like that.

I pretty avoid that place now.

One other point that was a sore spot with the moderators is if you joked about BYU's losing streak. It constituted pure bashing in their minds, as if you painted the goal posts red. If we could get out of that persecuted mentality, maybe we could better rank order that which is blatantly unacceptable and that which may rankled tender feathers but otherwise has merit.

Well, at least I can walk away and say I treated the moderation staff in general, better than some of them treated me.

That part about Paul getting banned just for expressing his regrets that I was banned makes me feel bad. It also makes me wish that Mormon moderators were not so imperious and unscrupulous with their abuse of power. Just remember that fellow religionists next time you complain about your treatment at CARM.

Those moderators really get off on being able to click and delete people. For them, it is a turn on. That is their pleasure in life. They pretty much spend their time looking for means to ban people.

Oh, if I wanted to I could reappear and post some nasty porn or something like that and tell Pam to unzip and roll over. But, that's not my style. I'll leave them to their selfrighteousness. Mormons are a very judgemental people. No wonder they always having problems getting along. Joseph Smith and his band were the worst. Several states couldn't stand them and they had to flee. Mormons are an in your face people and seek to trample the rights of others.

Paul O

Yesterday I was banned from LDS.Net Never to be welcomed there again . Pam even falsely accused me of making a personal threat against her when I informed her that if she wouldn't intervene in the attacks against me that i would handle it myself ..meaning i would attack back .. I came to her to try to avoid trouble ..I did not know that she was trouble ..I know i am ill but she is dangerously ill
Anyway what really got me banned was that i told a mod the truth .I made it very clear to him what i thought and the rest was history ..

The official reason for the ban was that i was bashing the mods and just about everyone who responded to me ..

And yes a mod tried to entrap me as well ..Pitiful..

Andy

Andy wrote:Yesterday I was banned from LDS.Net Never to be welcomed there again . Pam even falsely accused me of making a personal threat against her when I informed her that if she wouldn't intervene in the attacks against me that i would handle it myself ..meaning i would attack back .. I came to her to try to avoid trouble ..I did not know that she was trouble ..I know i am ill but she is dangerously ill
Anyway what really got me banned was that i told a mod the truth .I made it very clear to him what i thought and the rest was history ..

The official reason for the ban was that i was bashing the mods and just about everyone who responded to me ..

And yes a mod tried to entrap me as well ..Pitiful..

Andy

Poor Pam. She really is pitiful. The only power she really has is in clicking buttons. I never gave her a moments problem on that board. But she banned me nonetheless to show her priesthood power! She didn't even give me time to drop my pants and say something nasty in return.

Paul O