Paul Osborne wrote:Hey, I resemble that remark. I post using my real name and my latest picture that I self snapped sitting on my chaise. I'm not stupid. I may be a bit crazy and wild, but I'm not stupid.
So, take it back lest I call you a real nasty word and flame your ass down in the telestial board. I'll make sport of you if you don't apologize.
Paul O
Sorry Mr Osborne :) ....i meant: "stupid enough to post with his real name and whine, incessantly, about the repercussions"...you seem to embrace and enjoy (in a masochistic way) any repercussions that accompany using your actual name on this message board...i consider that a virtue worthy of respect...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
schreech wrote:stupid enough to post with his actual name...
Hey, I resemble that remark. I post using my real name and my latest picture that I self snapped sitting on my chaise. I'm not stupid. I may be a bit crazy and wild, but I'm not stupid.
So, take it back lest I call you a real nasty word and flame your ass down in the telestial board. I'll make sport of you if you don't apologize.
Paul O
Hey, Paul, suppose that your registered moniker was "posborne" and where you learned to work on air conditioning systems and then you got upset that someone called you "Paul" on the board. Imagine that. You gave your first initial and your last name, but become indignant that someone calls you by your first name.
sock puppet wrote:Those who choose to stalk Doctor Scratch will find themselves bit on the behind from time to time. He is more than capable of defending himself.
Especially with his creepy network of informants.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
Hey, Paul, suppose that your registered moniker was "posborne" and where you learned to work on air conditioning systems and then you got upset that someone called you "Paul" on the board. Imagine that. You gave your first initial and your last name, but become indignant that someone calls you by your first name.
What are you trying to demonstrate with that, sock?
I'm of a mind that our screen names should be respected on this board unless and until we choose to disclose all or any part of our real names.
by the way, do you know what my first name is? Just curious.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
sock puppet wrote:So, let me see if I have this right.
1. It's okay for the critics on this board to be offended by Mormonism/apologetics 2. It's not okay for a Mormon/apologist to express his offense.
How close am I?
Can you point me to a post where a critic claimed to be "offended" by Mormon apologetics? Not saying it doesn't happen, i am just not sure i have come across a post like that...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
schreech wrote: Sorry Mr Osborne :) ....i meant: "stupid enough to post with his real name and whine, incessantly, about the repercussions"...you seem to embrace and enjoy (in a masochistic way) any repercussions that accompany using your actual name on this message board...i consider that a virtue worthy of respect...
Jersey Girl wrote:So, let me see if I have this right.
1. It's okay for the critics on this board to be offended by Mormonism/apologetics 2. It's not okay for a Mormon/apologist to express his offense.
How close am I?
screech wrote:Can you point me to a post where a critic claimed to be "offended" by Mormon apologetics? Not saying it doesn't happen, i am just not sure i have come across a post like that...
Do you have any idea at all how inconvenient it is for me to have to take you off ignore in order to read the addle brained comments that you make?
Please read the post your quoting from once again. Carefully.
I included both Mormonism and apologetics.
See it?
Having said that, it it weren't for their taking offense to both Mormonism and apologetics, the ex-Mo's on this board would largely have not a damn thing to discuss on this board.
Good bye.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
schreech wrote: Sorry Mr Osborne :) ....i meant: "stupid enough to post with his real name and whine, incessantly, about the repercussions"...you seem to embrace and enjoy (in a masochistic way) any repercussions that accompany using your actual name on this message board...i consider that a virtue worthy of respect...
Oh, OK, all is well.
You gave me a scare for a second.
Paul O
it was the bushmills speaking :) - it tends to make me less than clear....
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs