Scratch's Tactics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Infymus »

Simon Belmont wrote:OR... (and keep an open mind about this) you could act like an adult and be respectful of other people.

Just a thought.


Oh, just like YOU, right Simon? Shall we go back through the 1000+ messages, and count the number of times YOU have been respectful of other people?

Jesus Christ you're such a prick.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Molok »

Lol @ this board. Never in m life have I run across a forum with so much butthurt. Almost every single poster here is a socially inept, insecure, jealous, petty, weasel. Goddamn I love you guys.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _sock puppet »

Simon Belmont wrote:
sock puppet wrote:This thread is likely Exhibit #39 for Doctor Scratch about your board-nannying.

Although I do admit, being a whiny tattle-tale was something I remember from my time as a TBM, particularly on a mission, was encouraged and rewarded. So maybe this thread is a legitimate Mormon topic.



Wait... why didn't you harp on Scratch for making a similar thread about me?

I suppose that you are referring to Doctor Scratch's thread: Inside the Mind of Simon Belmont.
If so, in that thread Doctor Scratch provided background information about your ZLMB history and aim at Brent Metcalfe. That explained what has appeared here as a mystery to some (including me) about your posting as Simon Belmont regarding Brent. Doctor Scratch was not complaining about you as much as he was providing information that if anything explains what had been a mystery. ttribe in this thread is merely whining about that he has been mistreated by Doctor Scratch, given the Board rules. If Doctor Scratch starts a thread whining that he's been mistreated by you, given the Board rules, I'll call him out as a whiner. (I'd be surprised if Doctor Scratch ever were to start such a thread. I think he realizes what the practical extent of the Board is, and takes his lumps--rare as they are, he's very skillful in having assessed the Board's strengths, weaknesses and other dynamics and navigates them with tremendous skill--knowing the rare lump is the consequence of his participation on the Board under the circumstances. I do not see Doctor Scratch to be someone who turns pro-Mormon posts into attacks against him personally and then whines about it.)
_Simon Belmont

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Infymus wrote:
Oh, just like YOU, right Simon? Shall we go back through the 1000+ messages, and count the number of times YOU have been respectful of other people?

Jesus Christ you're such a prick.


LOL, Infymus... I thought I was on ignore. Damn that curiosity of yours!

Here is the bottom line:

You have created a hate site against another religious group. This site contains copy/paste plagiarisms from here as well as from RfM. In addition, it contains private correspondences. All of these things are carefully cherry-picked and used out of context to support your bigot-site.

If that isn't enough, you engaged in e-mail correspondence with DCP, where you acted like an infantile sprog (I've read the exchange in its entirety), saying things that I wouldn't say to my worst enemy (i.e. when you f*** your mother, do you call out your own name). When SHIELDS posted this correspondence on their site, you, realizing that what you said was highly embarrassing, proceeded to go ape-shit, cry and bitch like a little child, and threaten legal action for SHIELDS posting something that you said. Repeat: something that YOU SAID.

Can a person be any more outright imbecilic?


In other words, YOU have absolutely no right to call ME a "prick."
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _sock puppet »

There is this ttribe post that Doctor Scratch might be referring to.

In it, RayA had asked why ttribe's MAD mates had left him alone to do battle here. ttribe did not dispute RayA's suggestion that ttribe is here doing battle. ttribe only addressed the suggestion by RayA that ttribe and those mates that had abandoned him here might be acting in concert, such as part of a team. That rather than the more stinging suggestion by RayA that ttribe's participation here was doing battle by ttribe.
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Infymus »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Infymus wrote:
Oh, just like YOU, right Simon? Shall we go back through the 1000+ messages, and count the number of times YOU have been respectful of other people?

Jesus Christ you're such a prick.


LOL, Infymus... I thought I was on ignore. Damn that curiosity of yours!

Here is the bottom line:

You have created a hate site against another religious group. This site contains copy/paste plagiarisms from here as well as from RfM. In addition, it contains private correspondences. All of these things are carefully cherry-picked and used out of context to support your bigot-site.

If that isn't enough, you engaged in e-mail correspondence with DCP, where you acted like an infantile sprog (I've read the exchange in its entirety), saying things that I wouldn't say to my worst enemy (i.e. when you f*** your mother, do you call out your own name). When SHIELDS posted this correspondence on their site, you, realizing that what you said was highly embarrassing, proceeded to go ape-s***, cry and bitch like a little child, and threaten legal action for SHIELDS posting something that you said. Repeat: something that YOU SAID.

Can a person be any more outright imbecilic?


In other words, YOU have absolutely no right to call ME a "prick."


This thread isn't about me Simon. Create a new one please.
_Simon Belmont

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Infymus wrote:


This thread isn't about me Simon. Create a new one please.


It isn't about me, either.

Either way, it is noted that you have no defense.
_ttribe

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _ttribe »

sock puppet wrote:I suppose that you are referring to Doctor Scratch's thread: Inside the Mind of Simon Belmont.
If so, in that thread Doctor Scratch provided background information about your ZLMB history and aim at Brent Metcalfe. That explained what has appeared here as a mystery to some (including me) about your posting as Simon Belmont regarding Brent. Doctor Scratch was not complaining about you as much as he was providing information that if anything explains what had been a mystery. ttribe in this thread is merely whining about that he has been mistreated by Doctor Scratch, given the Board rules. If Doctor Scratch starts a thread whining that he's been mistreated by you, given the Board rules, I'll call him out as a whiner. (I'd be surprised if Doctor Scratch ever were to start such a thread. I think he realizes what the practical extent of the Board is, and takes his lumps--rare as they are, he's very skillful in having assessed the Board's strengths, weaknesses and other dynamics and navigates them with tremendous skill--knowing the rare lump is the consequence of his participation on the Board under the circumstances. I do not see Doctor Scratch to be someone who turns pro-Mormon posts into attacks against him personally and then whines about it.)

Let's just make sure we're clear about something - you have no problem, whatsoever, with the underhanded tactics Scratch has to resort to in an effort to silence his enemies? You see, if this was an apologist doing such things, I suspect you'd be OUT OF YOUR MIND with anger and screaming about how said apologist's arguments can't stand or fall on their own; that such tactics were just diversions. It seems your status as a resident at the farcical "Cassius University" has introduced a level of bias into your thinking that prevents you from seeing these things for what they really are.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Kishkumen »

ttribe wrote:It seems your status as a resident at the farcical "Cassius University" has introduced a level of bias into your thinking that prevents you from seeing these things for what they really are.


Gee, ttribe, I was inclined to feel sympathetic toward you in your plight until you started trashing on my employer.

Next you'll start lashing out at EJJS, calling it a "joke journal."
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Simon Belmont

Re: Scratch's Tactics

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Hey Scratch, I can data-mine too.

Ray A, 2007 wrote:But you insist on this cankerous HYPOCRISY by claiming adherence to Mormonism while trying to cut its throat! Would you like me to

spell it out for you? You are a hypocrite and a backstabber. If you claim to believe Mormonism while stabbing it in the back, you are the last person on

earth I would trust, because traitors are scum!

...

I think you're a very deceptive person. Do tell me what you believe, and where you stand in regard to Mormonism. Does anyone know? Has anyone ever

asked? Why don't we put YOU under scrutiny for a change, instead of DCP? Who the hell are you? You've been putting everyone under scrutiny, but we know

next to nothing about you! Can you even verify that you are "Phineas Scratch"? And, what do you believe, or disbelieve?

...

I reiterate, you are a deceptive person, and an inveterate LIAR.

...

You don't want respectful engagement, Scratch, you just want attention, and you're prepared to sensationalise and speculate beyond good taste. If this excites your fan club, then you can bask in your five minutes of fame.

...

Look at your own HATE blog.

...

Don't you see the stench of your hypocrisy? In a word, you are a bully, you can give, but you can't take. You represent the lowest form of cowardice know to human beings.

...



Last edited by _Simon Belmont on Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply