Page 1 of 42

Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:46 pm
by _Darth J
Dear Simon:

Having failed to demonstrate any specific knowledge about the Church you claim to defend (on the internet, I mean---it wasn't important enough for a mission or anything like that), I find it striking that you don't understand the apologist talking points that you parrot, either.

"Quote mining" in apologist parlance does not means reflexively kvetching every time your contradicting the Church is pointed out by legitimate sources of LDS doctrine. "Quote mining" means taking a quote out of context to misrepresent church teachings or policy.

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/H ... the_Church

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/Ensign

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/J ... Discourses

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/D ... _Salvation

Since you have now decided to cry "quote mining!" whenever I point out that your baseless assertions more often than not are diametrically opposed to what the LDS Church actually teaches, you are cordially invited to point out a single thing I have posted on this board from General Conference talks, the Ensign, the scriptures, and/or recent church curricula that is taken out of context, or that does not accurately represent the position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on any given topic.

Ready.....go!

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:00 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
Has anyone else ever noticed Darth J is like the mopologists worst nightmare?

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:09 pm
by _sock puppet
Darth J,

It's all 'quote mining' when you refer to a COJCOLDS statement outside the context of the Spirit--the Spirit of everything-COJCOLDS-is-correct.

In the context of the Spirit, the illogical makes sense and every COJCOLDS quote has its context.

With the Spirit, every COJCOLDS statement makes the bosom burn; without it, the statement is confounding.

This message was brought to you on behalf of Apologetic Holiness of Limited Enlightenment--the AHOLE movement.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:36 pm
by _RockSlider
that avatar is so dark and glumy

please bring Miley back.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:39 pm
by _Kishkumen
I have a shrine to Darth J that is now receiving blood sacrifices. I kid you not.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:41 am
by _sock puppet
Kishkumen wrote:I have a shrine to Darth J that is now receiving blood sacrifices. I kid you not.

After you slay the lamb and spill its blood on the altar, can you then make kabobs?

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:20 am
by _beefcalf
Has anyone else ever noticed Darth J is like the mopologists worst nightmare?


I've noticed.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:52 am
by _Tchild
MrStakhanovite wrote:Has anyone else ever noticed Darth J is like the mopologists worst nightmare?

I haven't decided if I prefer reading Darth J. destroy the convoluted non-logic of the internet Mormon mopologist with the very teachings of the church they profess to be defending, or watching primo asian porn?

They both relieve stress, so the verdict is not yet out.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:17 pm
by _Dr. Shades
sock puppet wrote:It's all 'quote mining' when you refer to a COJCOLDS statement outside the context of the Spirit--the Spirit of everything-COJCOLDS-is-correct.

In the context of the Spirit, the illogical makes sense and every COJCOLDS quote has its context.

With the Spirit, every COJCOLDS statement makes the bosom burn; without it, the statement is confounding.

Replace the words "the Spirit" with the word "Mopologetics" and I think you've nailed it.

Re: Simon Belmont: This is what "quote mining" means

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:40 pm
by _Simon Belmont
Darth J wrote:Dear Simon:

Having failed to demonstrate any specific knowledge about the Church you claim to defend (on the internet, I mean---it wasn't important enough for a mission or anything like that), I find it striking that you don't understand the apologist talking points that you parrot, either.

"Quote mining" in apologist parlance does not means reflexively kvetching every time your contradicting the Church is pointed out by legitimate sources of LDS doctrine. "Quote mining" means taking a quote out of context to misrepresent church teachings or policy.

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/H ... the_Church

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/Ensign

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/J ... Discourses

http://en.fairmormon.org/Quote_mining/D ... _Salvation

Since you have now decided to cry "quote mining!" whenever I point out that your baseless assertions more often than not are diametrically opposed to what the LDS Church actually teaches, you are cordially invited to point out a single thing I have posted on this board from General Conference talks, the Ensign, the scriptures, and/or recent church curricula that is taken out of context, or that does not accurately represent the position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on any given topic.

Ready.....go!


I'm not an apologist.