The Boundaries of Experience

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Simon Belmont »

sock puppet wrote:But I'm still not trying to imagine a chair that isn't there, now am I?


The point is that, whether your five senses detect data that could be interpreted as a chair by your brain does not affect the existence of the chair.

There could be thousands of "objects" surrounding you at any given time, simply because your five senses do not detect them does not render them nonexistent.

...or does it?
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Simon Belmont »

karl61 wrote:If I remember right color is just a thing created in the mind/brain. In reality if you were to see things as they are you would not recognize it - it's all black and white and crazy.


I agree. My interpretation of the color blue could be vastly different from your interpretation. If you could literally see through my eyes, the entire world could appear vastly different.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Simon,

Image

There is no cow. That's actually a 5,000 word dissertation on metaphysics that supports your position.

You win.

V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Darth J »

Darth J wrote:Simon:

Is the existence of a vast pre-Columbian civilization of Hebrew Christians objective or subjective?


Well?
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
karl61 wrote:If I remember right color is just a thing created in the mind/brain. In reality if you were to see things as they are you would not recognize it - it's all black and white and crazy.


I agree. My interpretation of the color blue could be vastly different from your interpretation. If you could literally see through my eyes, the entire world could appear vastly different.


Simon:

How is the field of optometry able to exist if things like vision and interpreting colors are completely subjective?
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _sock puppet »

Simon Belmont wrote:
sock puppet wrote:But I'm still not trying to imagine a chair that isn't there, now am I?


The point is that, whether your five senses detect data that could be interpreted as a chair by your brain does not affect the existence of the chair.

There could be thousands of "objects" surrounding you at any given time, simply because your five senses do not detect them does not render them nonexistent.

...or does it?


Well, then your god is invisible, makes no sound, cannot be felt if touched, has no smell, and has no taste. Funny, are you aware of what the Mormon conception of god is?
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Darth J wrote:
Well?


You are welcome to begin a thread on this topic, Darth J. It does not really fit into this one.
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Darth J wrote:
Simon:

How is the field of optometry able to exist if things like vision and interpreting colors are completely subjective?


Science has provided us with ways to measure the functions of the human eye, and to determine if it falls within acceptable parameters. Science has not provided us with insight into subjective experience of any of the senses.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Darth J wrote:
Well?


You are welcome to begin a thread on this topic, Darth J. It does not really fit into this one.


Yes, it does. You are talking about what reality is in the context of religious belief on a board focused on Mormonism.

The LDS Church proposes that subjective experience is proof of objective fact.

If the Book of Mormon is true, then the Nephites really existed in the objective, physical world.

So, is the existence of the Nephite civilization objective or subjective?
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Boundaries of Experience

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Darth J wrote:
Simon:

How is the field of optometry able to exist if things like vision and interpreting colors are completely subjective?


Science has provided us with ways to measure the functions of the human eye, and to determine if it falls within acceptable parameters. Science has not provided us with insight into subjective experience of any of the senses.


How can a person be determined to be color blind if "blue" is subjective?

How can a person be determined to be blind if what we see is entirely subjective?

How can an optometrist "measure the functions of the human eye, and determine if it falls within acceptable parameters" unless he or she takes what a person subjectively describes he is seeing and measures that against objective standards?
Post Reply