Doctor Scratch wrote:It was?
No.
Then how come you said, in your OP, that you read it as a "book"? And the pub. date is 1997. Did they have Wordpress blogs back in 1997, when you were in college?
It was a joke.
Doctor Scratch wrote:It was?
Then how come you said, in your OP, that you read it as a "book"? And the pub. date is 1997. Did they have Wordpress blogs back in 1997, when you were in college?
Simon Belmont wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:It was?
No.Then how come you said, in your OP, that you read it as a "book"? And the pub. date is 1997. Did they have Wordpress blogs back in 1997, when you were in college?
It was a joke.
Doctor Scratch wrote:What was a joke? That you "were in college"? And am I correct to assume that the author himself assigned this book to your class?
sock puppet wrote:Simon, did they also have you read at BYU Blahnik's Sense, Sex and Sin? Just wondering what you thought of that?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Hello,
I think when you have to resort to the realm of metaphysical reasoning in order to make sense of spirituality then you have a tough sell, especially so when you belong to an organization that claims to reveal plain and precious truths. If God, as it were, is so nuanced and mysterious then Mormonism gets it wrong. God is defined by the Mormon church, over and over again as something real, tangbile, and with a body of flesh and bone. Wondering if his atomic makeup qualifies him as existential or not is an exercise in foolishness, aside from claiming his existence itself.
V/R
Dr. Cam
Blixa wrote:Uh, wait what?
I took a long time composing a reply, I admit. I left the computer and did some things and came back. But, still, I'm confused.
You were just making a joke by saying you read it on a Wordpress blog, Simon? Why would that be a joke?
My response was about, among other things, how such a thing was integrated into the class. I wanted to know because I use similar media in my courses.
So..is it worth asking more questions, Simon, or not?
For what it's worth, the following is my original response however dated it is now. I'm still curious about the book, Simon, and wish you would talk more about it:
Interesting! The issue of "academic vanity presses" is vexed. I hope you didn't think I immediately dismissed the book because of that; in fact it may be a very useful way for teachers to get material into the hands of students. What you say about it's use on a blog is even more interesting, though, because I use the same media to give my students access to materials. I'd really like to know more about how the instructor used this in class.
In that spirit, then, why did these ideas make such a difference to you? Do they still have that impact, or was it an effect of encountering them for the first time? Do you think that their importance was relative to the time of your life you encountered them? Or to the conditions you encountered them under (for example, the particular teacher)? And, what is there connection to your current spiritual beliefs? To Mormonism in general?
Doctor Scratch wrote:Didn't Simon say that he went to a school that's "better" than BYU?
Simon Belmont wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:Didn't Simon say that he went to a school that's "better" than BYU?
Are you going to:
1. Contribute to the thread, or
2. Attack me and set obvious traps for me to walk into?
If (1), please start doing it. If (2) I invite you to post elsewhere.
I can predict your response now: "but where did I set traps for you Simon?" And I am not going to explain it.