Dr. Shades wrote:[MODERATOR NOTE: Your thread wasn't deleted. It duplicated the subject matter (and the title as well) of a thread already in progress, so I merged the two for readers' convenience.
Click here and you'll find your posts--and everyone else's posts--in that thread safe and sound in their non-deleted state.]
MDB: 1 Simon Belmont: 0
"Christian anti-Mormons are no different than that wonderful old man down the street who turns out to be a child molester." - Obiwan, nutjob Mormon apologist - Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:25 pm
Dr. Shades wrote:[MODERATOR NOTE: Your thread wasn't deleted. It duplicated the subject matter (and the title as well) of a thread already in progress, so I merged the two for readers' convenience.
Click here and you'll find your posts--and everyone else's posts--in that thread safe and sound in their non-deleted state.]
Dr. Shades wrote:[MODERATOR NOTE: Your thread wasn't deleted. It duplicated the subject matter (and the title as well) of a thread already in progress, so I merged the two for readers' convenience.
Click here and you'll find your posts--and everyone else's posts--in that thread safe and sound in their non-deleted state.]
MDB: 1 Simon Belmont: 0
Alright. No revolution. Time to go home and put away the pitchforks.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden ~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
Unacceptable. The thread itself was a duplicate of at least two other thread by Joseph, yet it did not get 'combined' with them. Darrick posts the same three threads over and over, yet they do not get 'combined.'
Simon Belmont wrote:Unacceptable. The thread itself was a duplicate of at least two other thread by Joseph, yet it did not get 'combined' with them. Darrick posts the same three threads over and over, yet they do not get 'combined.'
They have different titles. You tried to divert from Joseph's through the confusion of using an identical title to an already in progress thread. Yours were the efforts to censor, not Dr Shades'.
Simon Belmont wrote:Unacceptable. The thread itself was a duplicate of at least two other thread by Joseph, yet it did not get 'combined' with them. Darrick posts the same three threads over and over, yet they do not get 'combined.'
[MODERATOR NOTE: As sock puppet stated, they had/have different titles, so there is less confusion. More importantly, they were active at different times and thus reside on separate pages.]
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
I am glad we live in a world where the content of a thread doesn't matter, but the title is the pinnacle of importance. I am also glad that rules can be made up on a whim by moderators.
If this were a thread began by a critic, it would not have been ' combined'
Simon Belmont wrote:I am glad we live in a world where the content of a thread doesn't matter, but the title is the pinnacle of importance. I am also glad that rules can be made up on a whim by moderators.
If this were a thread began by a critic, it would not have been ' combined'
What were your good and noble intentions of starting a thread with the exact same title as that of an already in progress thread?