Ray A wrote:schreech wrote:You are not talking about UFO's so I say no.....
[You are receiving this message from the Mothership]:
Don't be so sure.
[/End of telepathically sent message]
That's the VB speaking...:)
Ray A wrote:schreech wrote:You are not talking about UFO's so I say no.....
[You are receiving this message from the Mothership]:
Don't be so sure.
[/End of telepathically sent message]
Jersey Girl wrote:There is no possible way that Porter is Joseph. Whatever impression you may have developed of Porter, I can tell you that you are wrong.
Jersey Girl wrote:Porter is intelligent, creative and humorous.
Joseph is a dullard.
Jersey Girl wrote:Posting under one's in real life name isn't required on a board like this and I personally, wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
Joseph wrote:
It doesn't sound like lds-inc 'targeting' sections of an area for intense missionary proselyting and door knocking?
Whats wrong, you can't take it when it is directed at TheLard'sAnointed'?
Ray A wrote:Joseph wrote:
It doesn't sound like lds-inc 'targeting' sections of an area for intense missionary proselyting and door knocking?
Whats wrong, you can't take it when it is directed at TheLard'sAnointed'?
How many Mormons have you deconverted in real life? Is it your aim to deconvert your family and/or friends who are LDS (if you have such family)?
Themis wrote:
Do you think it would be unethical of him to try and deconvert(not sure that's a word) people, and if yes why?
Ray A wrote:Themis wrote:
Do you think it would be unethical of him to try and deconvert(not sure that's a word) people, and if yes why?
The question was directed at Joseph. Don't assume what I'm thinking. I'd like Joseph to answer the question.
Themis wrote:If you read what I said you would realize I never assumed, but asked what you thought. I see you have avioded answering more then once.