DiscussMormonism.com

If it's not worth "caring" about, then why all the secrecy and dodginess? Why the rage-fueled eruption from Mike "Tubby" Parker? Why not simply publish the names of the Board members? Why not provide simple answers to straightforward questions?

attendant housing,.... at making a profit on selling its condos

Couldn't the mall could offer their parking lot attendants, and restroom attendants, store clerks, and janitors free condos? For non-Mo's they would have to convert first? Wouldn't that get them out of the financial hole they have dug for themselves? I'm sorry, just an honest question. I have no understanding of economics. <grin>

Doctor Scratch wrote:If it's not worth "caring" about, then why all the secrecy and dodginess? Why the rage-fueled eruption from Mike "Tubby" Parker? Why not simply publish the names of the Board members? Why not provide simple answers to straightforward questions?

Because the questions are irrelevant.

Simon Belmont wrote:

Doctor Scratch wrote:If it's not worth "caring" about, then why all the secrecy and dodginess? Why the rage-fueled eruption from Mike "Tubby" Parker? Why not simply publish the names of the Board members? Why not provide simple answers to straightforward questions?

Because the questions are irrelevant.

If truly irrelevant, and the information benign, why have the FAIRites put up such a stink and not just provided the information requested? It has taken much more time to protest and keep concealed than it would have simply to have answered it.

Is there some special reason that Mormons have a problem with Occam's Razor? It's been a long time since I fled the cult, so I must confess to not understanding why TBMs and especially moplogists always 'take the long way home'.

sock puppet wrote:If truly irrelevant, and the information benign, why have the FAIRites put up such a stink and not just provided the information requested?

If every organization were required to surrender information at the whim or malevolent stalkers on random Internet message boards, there would never be time to actually participate in meeting the goals of the organization.

For an object lesson, do you believe that your real life identity is benign?

Simon Belmont wrote:For an object lesson, do you believe that your real life identity is benign?

Not with people like you lurking about.

Simon Belmont wrote:

sock puppet wrote:If truly irrelevant, and the information benign, why have the FAIRites put up such a stink and not just provided the information requested?

If every organization were required to surrender information at the whim or malevolent stalkers on random Internet message boards, there would never be time to actually participate in meeting the goals of the organization.

For an object lesson, do you believe that your real life identity is benign?

You do realize that FAIR being a non-profit (i.e., not wanting to pay income taxes on its profits), that it must file an IRS Form 990 each year which is available at many outlets on the internet (despite being expunged when re-posted here)?

The point is that by asking for non-profit (non-tax) status, the FAIR board has given up its anonymity.

I on the other hand am a taxpaying entity, and thus my identity is not something available to the public.

So, not really much of an object lesson, is it?

Kishkumen wrote:Not with people like you lurking about.

No, of course not, because I am so evil...

I have relentlessly stalked an LDS professor for the better part of a decade. Monitoring and criticizing his every move...

Oh wait.

sock puppet wrote:So, not really much of an object lesson, is it?

Is information about your identity benign or not?

Dr. Shades wrote:

Nomad wrote:I don't believe Will ever said any such thing.

Oh yeah, he did.

I think you are misrepresenting what he did say.

Don't worry, I'm not.

Very little said by the most hated of the apologists gets reported accurately in this place.

This is.

Bald assertions + No evidence = B.S.

Still waiting for a link to support your allegations ...