Will Schryver wrote:I have never used that revolting term, in any setting, in my entire life.
I know who this reminds me of!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSDAXGXGiEw
Will Schryver wrote:I have never used that revolting term, in any setting, in my entire life.
Kevin Graham wrote:Uh huh, didn't you say the same thing about your "bitch" comment towards Emma Smith? You then were forced to fess up once the evidence was thrown in your face. Your history is that you're willing to lie about something so long as you think no one can prove otherwise. This makes MsJack's claim far ore credible than yours. In fact, your denial of it is enough serves to strengthen her claim against you.
But you pretending to be all indignant is just a smoke and mirror show. She could have deleted that one example and her post would still stand as a devastating testament against your character. Most of the other citations you admit saying, so all you're doing here is the typical apologetic maneuver employed by so many FARMS reviewers. You point out one "lie" and then use the guilt by association to suggest the rest of the work is untrustworthy just the same. But you've already admitted saying most of what she attributes to you. How do you respond? Do you apologize to the women you've offended? No. A real man would, of course, but you're only interested in spinning every post in a way to make yourself look more important than you really are, or a victim. I doubt this gambit will work for you any longer. Too many respectable LDS apologists/scholars have denounced you as an abusive and foul person who makes the entire apologetic enterprise look bad.
Ceeboo wrote:For the most part (and by design) I have decided to not contribute to these types of threads.
for what it's worth, I will make a brief contribution.
Although I may be dispalying an outsider, never-Mo, and/or limited experienced opinion. Here it is anyway.
This attention is highly desired and sought after.
It allows further opportunity to widen the divide that exists.
It is, for several reasons, by design and wanted.
It promotes further reasons to draw thick, clear, and stubborn lines.
It eliminates the soft middle and forces hard sides.
It is calculated, measured, tested, and in my opinion works often.
Bizarre, waste, and in the end, offers very little value for anyone.
Peace,
Ceeboo
beastie wrote:Perhaps you would feel differently had it been your wife or daughter that Will called a bitch, whore, or worse. Or talked about the relative attractiveness of their bodies.
Will Schryver wrote:Without a sliver of doubt, had I, in actuality, said such a thing, it would have been preserved and made reference to in perpetuity.
It is a blatant lie. I have never used that revolting term, in any setting, in my entire life.
Ceeboo wrote:Hi beastie,
Did you take my post as support for William?
No, my opinion would not change if my wife or daughter were to be added to the "insult list" (It has nothing to do with my opinion offered)
Peace,
Ceeboo
beastie wrote:
No, I didn't take it that you supported Will, but rather that you thought this thread was pointless and a waste. It is with that I disagree.
Ceeboo wrote:
Hey again beastie,
I do not, in any way, think this thread is pointless or a waste of time.
Peace,
Ceeboo