Since some of you may have stopped following the other threads (can't blame you), but may still be interested in important developments in the Schryver Scandal, I thought this was worth mentioning in a thread of its own. The source is Nomad, so take that for what it's worth.
Nomad wrote:I was wrong about Will being in Europe this week. It turns out that doesn’t happen until next week. I asked him by e-mail about this WilliamSchryver post and him acknowledging that it was his. His reply:
I do not know how it was made to appear that I acknowledged making that post, but I did not.
As I have done every single time this quote has been mentioned (this thread is not the first time—that quote has been around for at least two years), I did not post as “WilliamSchryver” (no space between the names). I did not make the post in question.
Whoever did do it is to be commended for mimicking my style quite well. But it was not I.
-WS
P.S. I regret to say that it is true what has been reported about the traitors Hauglid and Bokovoy. My only commentary on their actions is: “You lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.”
Nomad wrote:I regret to say that it is true what has been reported about the traitors Hauglid and Bokovoy.
Hmm. Is there a chance that William Schryver was Doctor Scratch's informant?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
No kidding. It turns out Scratch is privy to some serious intel, after all. That's gotta piss them off, as they love to talk about how Scratch has an imaginary friend he likes to call informant.
The stock in Scratch's credibility just shot through the roof.
MsJack wrote:I cannot comment on William's distasteful remarks about Hauglid and Bokovoy, but I did debunk this latest lie from Belinda Damon Hammer here.
It shouldn't be too hard to determine whether "it was made to appear that [Will] acknowledged making that post." I would assume only someone with moderator privileges could pull off something like that.
Nomad wrote:I regret to say that it is true what has been reported about the traitors Hauglid and Bokovoy.
Hmm. Is there a chance that William Schryver was Doctor Scratch's informant?
The person who served as "informant" for this was not "Will Schryver," nor any of his suspected sock puppets (i.e., Nomad, Silver Hammer, Wheat, WilliamSchryver, William Schryver, Opie Rockwell, or Belinda Schryver). I suppose it still could be a Will Schryver sockpuppet, but I seriously doubt it. Let me put it this way: if this person is a Will Schryver sockpuppet, then Will is the greatest mole/traitor that the apologists have ever known.
But, as I said, I don't think it's him.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Dr. Shades wrote:Hmm. Is there a chance that William Schryver was Doctor Scratch's informant?
The person who served as "informant" for this was not "Will Schryver," nor any of his suspected sock puppets (i.e., Nomad, Silver Hammer, Wheat, WilliamSchryver, William Schryver, Opie Rockwell, or Belinda Schryver). I suppose it still could be a Will Schryver sockpuppet, but I seriously doubt it. Let me put it this way: if this person is a Will Schryver sockpuppet, then Will is the greatest mole/traitor that the apologists have ever known.
But, as I said, I don't think it's him.
Hang on; I was only joking! I thought that the notion of William Schryver being one of your informants would be good for a few laughs.
I wasn't in any way serious. Sorry about that.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Doctor Scratch wrote:The person who served as "informant" for this was not "Will Schryver," nor any of his suspected sock puppets (i.e., Nomad, Silver Hammer, Wheat, WilliamSchryver, William Schryver, Opie Rockwell, or Belinda Schryver). I suppose it still could be a Will Schryver sockpuppet, but I seriously doubt it. Let me put it this way: if this person is a Will Schryver sockpuppet, then Will is the greatest mole/traitor that the apologists have ever known.
But, as I said, I don't think it's him.
Hang on; I was only joking! I thought that the notion of William Schryver being one of your informants would be good for a few laughs.
I wasn't in any way serious. Sorry about that.
Oh, don't get me wrong, Shades: I think it would be pretty funny if my "informant" turned out to be William Schryver. The apologists---notably DCP---have been saying for quite a while that I'm "getting played" by one or more of the "informants." Do you think they'd still be saying that if it turned out to be Schryver?
Lol.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
I have to chuckle at the predictably apocalyptic language: "traitors." It's as if David and Brian have gone over to the forces of evil and mobocracy simply by expressing disapproval of someone's posting style.
This is a mostly pointless message board, not a battleground for the souls of humankind.