Page 1 of 3

Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:27 am
by _Droopy
Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts in the "Boy Was I Wrong" thread.


A perusal of Kevin Graham's posts and responses to his critics and the critics of MsJack in Wade's "Boy Was I Wrong" thread, reveals some interesting internal psychological dynamics at work. Beginning on page one and working through the thread, we find:



Wade's insanity is easily explained.

All you have left is name-calling.

Will is abnormally despicable,

OMFG.

You are a friggin moron

I tried to have cordial discussion with Will for two years, but eventually his ego couldn't handle the fact that he'd never be able to persuade me with his idiotic theories

I have asked Will's defenders to provide a single example that would even begin to compare to his attacks, and they've been silent because they know that they are essentially lying through their deceptive little teeth.

Right Wade...you appear to be the only supporter of William Schryver who is stupid enough to use his real name!

The only reason it ran to 63 pages was due to the idiotic and desperate attempts by immoral morons, mostly comprised of Schryver sock puppets, trying to either downplay, excuse or justify his behavior.

Again, you're an idiot for even thinking in these terms.

Funny that Schryver's only defenders are two morons who have no credibility, even from those within their tribe. One who has had too many brain cells destroyed due to alcohol abuse and another with a laundry list of learning disabilities that result in the same scripted responses over and over.

You're just a couple of uneducated hacks who feel like your ignorance can somehow be balanced out by your overwhelming loyalty to your tribe.

But according to you, I'm the one who lives on this forum? No, droppy, the opposite is true and it is sad you cannot remain sober enough to do basic math.

I do not have a nasty reputation.

At the very least we get to see yet another example of the despicable characters that are attracted to the call of Willpologia.

...William Schryver is an absolute moron.

LOL! It just burns you up inside whenever people recognize my posting as legitimate research.

Spin? I stated facts, and those facts will go ignored by the fools who wish to continue with this mischaracterization of the thread...

True, but like droopy, you will anyway. Because like droopy, you have no life outside this forum.

You're lying and you know it.

I know you think you're being witty here, but in reality you're just proving what an idiot you really are.

Unlike you (Wade Englund), David doesn't have a history of lying.

You're just trying to make excuses for your stupidity as usual...

The idea that the Book of Abraham is "threatening" is pretty hilarious in and of itself, but the fact that droopy is again trying to be some kind of apologetic messenger, given his past history as a one-man imitator of Curly, Larry and Moe on the subject, is enough to make you wonder if he is drunk again.

You're so slow wade, always at least four miles behind the rest of the pack.

You're always late for the party as always droopy

I just explained it dip****.

Coming from the king of morons, this is hardly surprising. You infer all sorts of dumb s*** all the time

My version is the only version that matters because I'm not the moron relying on some anonymous informant making idiotic claims that don't hold a drop of water.

This is the same moron who thinks the left is controlling the media, Soros is controlling the world, and that Glenn Beck is a reasonable fella.

Jesus, even by adding your two IQs together you're still not hitting triple digits... you can't understand something so simple? You're failure to attain cognition is pretty funny, but also sad.

You refuse to deal with the fact that you were too dumb to understand what was being said, and you were too dumb to understand that nothing wade presented contradicted what I said.

If you'd stop yapping for a second and wait for a response, you might be able to save yourself from looking even dumber.

Hilarious, Friggin hilarious the way you ramble on and on with the same programmed responses, completely oblivious that the God awful taste in your mouth is rotten crow.

Stop trying to expand your unique club of morons to include all my critics. Not all my critics are stupid, but you and wade most certainly are, and the best part is you make the case for me.

God you're dumb!

Aren't you the same guy who has a conniption fit every time someone pops in to thank me for my insightful and well researched contributions?

The fact is your idiotic statement made absolutely no sense...

And you then make the idiotic statement...

You and droops have always been inconsequential small frys who make me look much smarter than I really am.

I mean really, I know you're dumb, but no one on this forum can be this dumb....

It isn't even funny anymore how dumb you are

Please tell me you're not still asking me the idiotic question about...

You then go on with your usual idiotic rant...

But I guess you should get some kind of credit for not immediately slinking away into the shadows, even if the only reason you don't is because you're too stupid to know you've lost.

I just did, but again, you're tooo stupid to understand basic logic.

Trust me wade, EVERYONE feels dumber after trying to engage you in conversation.

I already said I suspected you disagreed with droopy, who was obviously too stupid to realize that was a possibility.

(Note, all the quotations above, from "Aren't you the same guy" all the way to the last quote are targeted wholly at Wade Englund alone, and occur just on page 22 of the thread).


Does anyone here detect a pattern here that could be indicative of a certain kind of psychology, character, and temperament?

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:36 am
by _Kevin Graham
The only thing these comments all have in common, is that they were in response to two complete morons. Wade and droopy. Now compare them to 99.99% of my posts that aren't responding to complete idiots.

LOL!

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:40 am
by _Droopy
I am now required to make a slight amendation to my OP, which will appear below at the end of the post.


Wade's insanity is easily explained.

All you have left is name-calling.

Will is abnormally despicable,

OMFG.

You are a friggin moron

I tried to have cordial discussion with Will for two years, but eventually his ego couldn't handle the fact that he'd never be able to persuade me with his idiotic theories

I have asked Will's defenders to provide a single example that would even begin to compare to his attacks, and they've been silent because they know that they are essentially lying through their deceptive little teeth.

Right Wade...you appear to be the only supporter of William Schryver who is stupid enough to use his real name!

The only reason it ran to 63 pages was due to the idiotic and desperate attempts by immoral morons, mostly comprised of Schryver sock puppets, trying to either downplay, excuse or justify his behavior.

Again, you're an idiot for even thinking in these terms.

Funny that Schryver's only defenders are two morons who have no credibility, even from those within their tribe. One who has had too many brain cells destroyed due to alcohol abuse and another with a laundry list of learning disabilities that result in the same scripted responses over and over.

You're just a couple of uneducated hacks who feel like your ignorance can somehow be balanced out by your overwhelming loyalty to your tribe.

But according to you, I'm the one who lives on this forum? No, droppy, the opposite is true and it is sad you cannot remain sober enough to do basic math.

I do not have a nasty reputation.

At the very least we get to see yet another example of the despicable characters that are attracted to the call of Willpologia.

...William Schryver is an absolute moron.

LOL! It just burns you up inside whenever people recognize my posting as legitimate research.

Spin? I stated facts, and those facts will go ignored by the fools who wish to continue with this mischaracterization of the thread...

True, but like droopy, you will anyway. Because like droopy, you have no life outside this forum.

You're lying and you know it.

I know you think you're being witty here, but in reality you're just proving what an idiot you really are.

Unlike you (Wade Englund), David doesn't have a history of lying.

You're just trying to make excuses for your stupidity as usual...

The idea that the Book of Abraham is "threatening" is pretty hilarious in and of itself, but the fact that droopy is again trying to be some kind of apologetic messenger, given his past history as a one-man imitator of Curly, Larry and Moe on the subject, is enough to make you wonder if he is drunk again.

You're so slow wade, always at least four miles behind the rest of the pack.

You're always late for the party as always droopy

I just explained it dip****.

Coming from the king of morons, this is hardly surprising. You infer all sorts of dumb s*** all the time

My version is the only version that matters because I'm not the moron relying on some anonymous informant making idiotic claims that don't hold a drop of water.

This is the same moron who thinks the left is controlling the media, Soros is controlling the world, and that Glenn Beck is a reasonable fella.

Jesus, even by adding your two IQs together you're still not hitting triple digits... you can't understand something so simple? You're failure to attain cognition is pretty funny, but also sad.

You refuse to deal with the fact that you were too dumb to understand what was being said, and you were too dumb to understand that nothing wade presented contradicted what I said.

If you'd stop yapping for a second and wait for a response, you might be able to save yourself from looking even dumber.

Hilarious, Friggin hilarious the way you ramble on and on with the same programmed responses, completely oblivious that the God awful taste in your mouth is rotten crow.

Stop trying to expand your unique club of morons to include all my critics. Not all my critics are stupid, but you and wade most certainly are, and the best part is you make the case for me.

God you're dumb!

Aren't you the same guy who has a conniption fit every time someone pops in to thank me for my insightful and well researched contributions?

The fact is your idiotic statement made absolutely no sense...

And you then make the idiotic statement...

You and droops have always been inconsequential small frys who make me look much smarter than I really am.

I mean really, I know you're dumb, but no one on this forum can be this dumb....

It isn't even funny anymore how dumb you are

Please tell me you're not still asking me the idiotic question about...

You then go on with your usual idiotic rant...

But I guess you should get some kind of credit for not immediately slinking away into the shadows, even if the only reason you don't is because you're too stupid to know you've lost.

I just did, but again, you're tooo stupid to understand basic logic.

Trust me wade, EVERYONE feels dumber after trying to engage you in conversation.

I already said I suspected you disagreed with droopy, who was obviously too stupid to realize that was a possibility.

(Note, all the quotations above, from "Aren't you the same guy" all the way to the last quote are targeted wholly at Wade Englund alone, and occur just on page 22 of the thread).

The only thing these comments all have in common, is that they were in response to two complete morons. Wade and droopy. Now compare them to 99.99% of my posts that aren't responding to complete idiots.


Does anyone here detect a pattern here that could be indicative of a certain kind of psychology, character, and temperament?

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:51 am
by _Droopy
Update: a few more linguistic vignettes have been added, even as we speak:


You are shown to be a complete moron after you spend numerous long winded posts trying to prove you're not,


This is all you do, and you're failure to succeed only makes you look dumber.

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:27 am
by _Kevin Graham
Good thing you added that piece droopy, otherwise you might be in danger of having yet another one of your threads consist of fewer than three responses.

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:39 am
by _moksha
We need Dr. Wade Englund to weigh in with his diagnosis.

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:47 am
by _Kevin Graham
wade is busy trying to master a few pronoun exercises for fifth graders. For those wondering what I've had to deal with tonight:

Kevin:
Why did [Will Schryver] panic by writing numerous LDS scholars to find out what was being said about you so you could preempt their efforts? Gee and Hauglid both sent Bokovoy a copy of the email you sent out to them trying to dig for information about what's been said.


wade:
Besides, if you look very carefully at your own statement, you spoke of "their efforts"--which you alledged Will was to preempt by writing to "numerous LDS scholars.


Kevin:
So? How does this change the fact that Bokovoy was not involved until Will got him involved? Quickly, claim I'm missing your ever elusive point, because you're so smart!


wade:
It doesn't change the alleged fact, nor was it intended to do anything of the sort-which leads me to ponder why, in all your presumed brilliance, you are asking me these inane questions? are you trying to appear smart? If so, it is having the opposite affect--just so you know.... Last time I checked, David Bokovoy is only one person. Who else were you referring to in using the plural "their"?... His comments were in regards to "threats" of his ouster relevant to what was being said on the mega thread (of which Bokovoy was not a part). This means that it was, in fact YOU, who interjected Bokovoy into the discussion at that point, and it was YOUR statement that contained the words "their efforts."


Kevin:
I only "interjected Bokovoy," to the extent that I said he was the recipient of numerous emails from those who had been contacted by Schryver....I clearly idenitified "Gee and Hauglid "and last time I checked, they represent two different people, which would, as some of us learned in grade school, constitute a plurality.

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:50 am
by _Morley
Droopy wrote:Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts in the "Boy Was I Wrong" thread.


A perusal of Kevin Graham's posts and responses to his critics and the critics of MsJack in Wade's "Boy Was I Wrong" thread, reveals some interesting internal psychological dynamics at work. Beginning on page one and working through the thread, we find:



Wade's insanity is easily explained.

All you have left is name-calling.

Will is abnormally despicable,

OMFG.

You are a friggin moron

I tried to have cordial discussion with Will for two years, but eventually his ego couldn't handle the fact that he'd never be able to persuade me with his idiotic theories

I have asked Will's defenders to provide a single example that would even begin to compare to his attacks, and they've been silent because they know that they are essentially lying through their deceptive little teeth.

Right Wade...you appear to be the only supporter of William Schryver who is stupid enough to use his real name!

The only reason it ran to 63 pages was due to the idiotic and desperate attempts by immoral morons, mostly comprised of Schryver sock puppets, trying to either downplay, excuse or justify his behavior.

Again, you're an idiot for even thinking in these terms.

Funny that Schryver's only defenders are two morons who have no credibility, even from those within their tribe. One who has had too many brain cells destroyed due to alcohol abuse and another with a laundry list of learning disabilities that result in the same scripted responses over and over.

You're just a couple of uneducated hacks who feel like your ignorance can somehow be balanced out by your overwhelming loyalty to your tribe.

But according to you, I'm the one who lives on this forum? No, droppy, the opposite is true and it is sad you cannot remain sober enough to do basic math.

I do not have a nasty reputation.

At the very least we get to see yet another example of the despicable characters that are attracted to the call of Willpologia.

...William Schryver is an absolute moron.

LOL! It just burns you up inside whenever people recognize my posting as legitimate research.

Spin? I stated facts, and those facts will go ignored by the fools who wish to continue with this mischaracterization of the thread...

True, but like droopy, you will anyway. Because like droopy, you have no life outside this forum.

You're lying and you know it.

I know you think you're being witty here, but in reality you're just proving what an idiot you really are.

Unlike you (Wade Englund), David doesn't have a history of lying.

You're just trying to make excuses for your stupidity as usual...

The idea that the Book of Abraham is "threatening" is pretty hilarious in and of itself, but the fact that droopy is again trying to be some kind of apologetic messenger, given his past history as a one-man imitator of Curly, Larry and Moe on the subject, is enough to make you wonder if he is drunk again.

You're so slow wade, always at least four miles behind the rest of the pack.

You're always late for the party as always droopy

I just explained it dip****.

Coming from the king of morons, this is hardly surprising. You infer all sorts of dumb s*** all the time

My version is the only version that matters because I'm not the moron relying on some anonymous informant making idiotic claims that don't hold a drop of water.

This is the same moron who thinks the left is controlling the media, Soros is controlling the world, and that Glenn Beck is a reasonable fella.

Jesus, even by adding your two IQs together you're still not hitting triple digits... you can't understand something so simple? You're failure to attain cognition is pretty funny, but also sad.

You refuse to deal with the fact that you were too dumb to understand what was being said, and you were too dumb to understand that nothing wade presented contradicted what I said.

If you'd stop yapping for a second and wait for a response, you might be able to save yourself from looking even dumber.

Hilarious, Friggin hilarious the way you ramble on and on with the same programmed responses, completely oblivious that the God awful taste in your mouth is rotten crow.

Stop trying to expand your unique club of morons to include all my critics. Not all my critics are stupid, but you and wade most certainly are, and the best part is you make the case for me.

God you're dumb!

Aren't you the same guy who has a conniption fit every time someone pops in to thank me for my insightful and well researched contributions?

The fact is your idiotic statement made absolutely no sense...

And you then make the idiotic statement...

You and droops have always been inconsequential small frys who make me look much smarter than I really am.

I mean really, I know you're dumb, but no one on this forum can be this dumb....

It isn't even funny anymore how dumb you are

Please tell me you're not still asking me the idiotic question about...

You then go on with your usual idiotic rant...

But I guess you should get some kind of credit for not immediately slinking away into the shadows, even if the only reason you don't is because you're too stupid to know you've lost.

I just did, but again, you're tooo stupid to understand basic logic.

Trust me wade, EVERYONE feels dumber after trying to engage you in conversation.

I already said I suspected you disagreed with droopy, who was obviously too stupid to realize that was a possibility.

(Note, all the quotations above, from "Aren't you the same guy" all the way to the last quote are targeted wholly at Wade Englund alone, and occur just on page 22 of the thread).


Does anyone here detect a pattern here that could be indicative of a certain kind of psychology, character, and temperament?


Wow, you're right, Droopy! I should have noticed this all on my own!

.....

Actually, it looks very reasonable to me.


Edited to remove sleep deprived attempt at humor that even I couldn't understand when I read it this morning.

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:15 am
by _jon
Droopy wrote:Does anyone here detect a pattern here that could be indicative of a certain kind of psychology, character, and temperament?



Yes, but not with Kevin...

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:56 am
by _Doctor CamNC4Me
Hello,

Well, there goes his dream of being published by NAMIRS.

Here's my official "psychological analysis of Kevin Graham's posts":

He doesn't suffer fools gladly.

V/R
Dr. Cameron