Page 1 of 1
What is this in reference to?
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:23 pm
by _EAllusion
From MADB's moderator in reference to this board:
The line is drawn where it suits them so they never have to be accountable. Kind of like how they created new rules to ban the person when a certain upper echelon someone offered elicit drugs in return for sexual favors. All traces were deleted and quietly made to go away till the poster brought it here. So yes they have banned a person permanently on that site.
Well I hope they live up to the same standards they have put out. They must destroy the misogynist that offered drugs for sex...
Re: What is this in reference to?
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:30 pm
by _Runtu
EAllusion wrote:From MADB's moderator in reference to this board:
The line is drawn where it suits them so they never have to be accountable. Kind of like how they created new rules to ban the person when a certain upper echelon someone offered elicit drugs in return for sexual favors. All traces were deleted and quietly made to go away till the poster brought it here. So yes they have banned a person permanently on that site.
Well I hope they live up to the same standards they have put out. They must destroy the misogynist that offered drugs for sex...
I have no idea, though I'm not sure what "elicit" drugs are. as far as I know, the only person to be banned was just a tad unstable. So, if she was making accusations about someone offering drugs for sex, I would take it with a grain of salt.
Of course, all else being equal, consider that this is coming from the MADB mods, who don't exactly have a track record of honesty and good behavior.
Re: What is this in reference to?
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:34 pm
by _Kevin Graham
Yeah, if they are referring to anything said by "barrelofmonkeys/Moniker" then it most likely isn't true. And most of what she complained about took place in PM or chat, not in open threads that were "deleted."
Re: What is this in reference to?
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:21 pm
by _Kishkumen
I don't know what this is in reference to. And that is the crucial difference between this alleged event and another, more recent, affair. That wasn't a continual pollution of this board by a person who aspired to represent a church bearing the name of Jesus Christ.
Hey, but why waste your time in productive reflection when you can get your quick revenge jollies, even if your thinking is incredibly poor?