DiscussMormonism.com

I know this topic is an anathema to this board, but I'm going to bring it up anyway. Should there be some modified criteria for banning? Perhaps if the participant is seen as a threat to the community or continuation of the board? I’m not even sure how I feel about this, but I wonder if the subject needs to be discussed.

Morley wrote:I know this topic is an anathema to this board, but I'm going to bring it up anyway. Should there be some modified criteria for banning? Perhaps if the participant is seen as a threat to the community or continuation of the board? I’m not even sure how I feel about this, but I wonder if the subject needs to be discussed.

I was thinking exactly the same thing. To me it goes without saying that someone who would do something of questionable legality to threaten the very existence of the board does not belong here, EVER AFTER.

Hello,

I believe there has only been one poster ever banned on this website. Her handle was Moniker.

I have no idea why she was banned.

V/R
Dr. Cameron

If we ban him he'll just come back using another sock puppet. What's the point really? The fact that he would want to hang around here after calling us names and talking the way he has about the forum in general, makes you wonder why he'd want to be here at all, but it just means we'd have another droopy on our hands.

Kevin Graham wrote:If we ban him he'll just come back using another sock puppet. What's the point really? The fact that he would want to hang around here after calling us names and talking the way he has about the forum in general, makes you wonder why he'd want to be here at all, but it just means we'd have another droopy on our hands.

Do you think a guy like that will find a work around if his ISP is blocked?

One Droopy is too many. Two Droopys is a fate too horrible to contemplate.