Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

Post by _Morley »

I really am for free speech. I like having a board with minimal moderation. I enjoy the discussion and tolerate those overboard personalities I have problems with.

However, people get suspended on the board for a few reasons. I've seen it happen. How is not one of the reasons attempting to shut down the board? Can't this be added to our constitution?

I am asking a real question here. Ideals are nice. Pragmatism is nice, too.

Any thoughts?

(Yeah, SGW, I know you're going to chime in. Chime away, my friend.)
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

Post by _gramps »

Yeah, 'corrective spankings' and all.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

Post by _Buffalo »

The apologists can leave MDB, but they can't leave MDB alone.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

Post by _Chap »

Yes, it's really, really odd:

SeattleGhostWriter wrote:I have said all I wanted to say, and far more than any of you deserve. I dust my feet of this place. Whoever has the power, please ban this account. I can be found in better places, where civil dignity can occur without malicious bigotry. You people are despicable to smear my private doing and family for the sake of scoring points towards you feeling better about throwing your blessings away.

I am sick to even type these words. Goodbye, delete me please. I promise and swear that from this moment forward I will deny ever having set foot in this wretched vomit pool lest the stink follow me home.


Yet here he is again.

None of that 'let your yea be yea, and your nay be nay' stuff here, I notice.

Hey, that bit where he says "I dust my feet of this place" - isn't that some kind of scary Mormon magic that will drain the brake fluid from our cars when we are cruising on the freeway? Should I be worried, on account of our collective guilt?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: Seriously, we have SGW back? Seriously?

Post by _gramps »

Someone posing as SSM just told us in the other thread that:

Nope. I was never here.


Someone has definitely spiked my glass of wine. I swear...
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
Post Reply