stemelbow wrote:This is all from memory for me and I'm not going to dig into it at all, but it seems to me Wade was hassled for being gay when the topic of homosexuality wasn't even part of the discussion. Perhaps the posters who did so, if my memory is right on that, were treating hm that way because of his views on homosexuality, but I didn't get that impression as the time. I just thought it odd that someone would say he's gay and make many references to that, as if that was some sort of insult in and of itself. Oh well.
You haven't been on the boards very long, stem. Wade has a history that is long and inglorious, regarding homosexuality.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
I never sexually harassed you wade - I just speculated that you might be gay. If you have a problem with that, you probably have a problem with gay people. As for me, I don't take that sort of homophobic attitude. I wouldn't care if someone thought I was gay because I hold gay and straight people in equal esteem. :)
Interesting rationalization. What excuses do you have to explain away the several lewd comments you made to me in your masturbation thread?
I am not asking because I can't handle your brand of sexual harassment. I am just interested to see the extent to which you try to wiggle out of your flagrant hypocrisy. It's quite funny. You are almost as bad at it as Kevin Graham.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Lewd comments? I don't recall any. I do recall that, due to a scientific study posted linking masturbation with decreased prostate cancer, a single male in his 50's like you should be flogging the dolphin regularly - if, that is, you care to live the spirit of the Word of Wisdom. I stand by that advice, and reiterate. Also, a glass of wine every day couldn't hurt. Jocelyn Elders had it right. To your health, Wade!
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.