Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

[_MrStakhanovite]

New Blog Post:

A good solid argument also is represented by the Torah as the right way to address God, that is, as an act of enormous devotion.

Sauce

[_Simon Belmont]

Why is this "contra Belmont?"

[_Doctor Scratch]

Why is this "contra Belmont?"

Probably because you seem to think that any argument/criticism against the Church is "bigotry."

[_Morley]

Why is this "contra Belmont?"

Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.

[_Simon Belmont]

Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.

Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.

[_Morley]

Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.

Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.

Disagree. Who judges what is "unfair and dishonest"? This seems like an arbitrary designation.

[_cafe crema]

Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.

Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.

Why is it unfair, all Rich did was show inconsistencies in JW teaching using what they've published.

[_MrStakhanovite]

Simon,

You think religions should be exempt from criticism, and advise people to talk about their own faiths instead of attacking others. So, I put Contra Belmont in the title.

[_MrStakhanovite]

Simon,

There is a lesson in this for you.

[_Droopy]

Why is this "contra Belmont?"

Probably because you seem to think that any argument/criticism against the Church is "bigotry."

edited by harmony: personal attack and say that again.