Page 1 of 2

Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:15 am
by _MrStakhanovite
New Blog Post:

A good solid argument also is represented by the Torah as the right way to address God, that is, as an act of enormous devotion.


Sauce

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:52 pm
by _Simon Belmont
Why is this "contra Belmont?"

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:58 pm
by _Doctor Scratch
Simon Belmont wrote:Why is this "contra Belmont?"


Probably because you seem to think that any argument/criticism against the Church is "bigotry."

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:58 pm
by _Morley
Simon Belmont wrote:Why is this "contra Belmont?"


Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:01 pm
by _Simon Belmont
Morley wrote:Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.


Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:14 pm
by _Morley
Simon Belmont wrote:
Morley wrote:Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.


Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.


Disagree. Who judges what is "unfair and dishonest"? This seems like an arbitrary designation.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:17 pm
by _cafe crema
Simon Belmont wrote:
Morley wrote:Perhaps because you seem to wish to exempt religions or religious belief (especially LDS) from criticism.


Unfair and dishonest criticism (like Rich's website)? Everyone should be exempt from that.


Why is it unfair, all Rich did was show inconsistencies in JW teaching using what they've published.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:32 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
Simon,

You think religions should be exempt from criticism, and advise people to talk about their own faiths instead of attacking others. So, I put Contra Belmont in the title.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:29 am
by _MrStakhanovite
Simon,

There is a lesson in this for you.

Re: Contra Belmont: Argument as Respect

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:32 am
by _Droopy
Doctor Scratch wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:Why is this "contra Belmont?"


Probably because you seem to think that any argument/criticism against the Church is "bigotry."



edited by harmony: personal attack and say that again.