The commentary on the “New Atheists” is where the book begins to earn it’s keep. At several points I felt like clapping for the authors, as they made their case against the ‘New Atheist’ approach to dialogue, which is a combination of aggression and ignorance. Their finest example has to do with the Ontological argument, which was by far, my favorite part of the book, and how this argument is useful is gauging people’s understanding of the more complex issues involved. If you don’t understand the Ontological argument, and do not have a reasoned response to it, your atheism is more than likely to be poorly justified.
SAUCE
I'd recomend this book to anyone here, unless your name is EA or Blixa.