DiscussMormonism.com

jon wrote:From another poster on a different board:

You have a lot of dumb questions.

Have you ever heard of Google?

Simon Belmont wrote:

jon wrote:From another poster on a different board:

You have a lot of dumb questions.

Have you ever heard of Google?

Simon,

If one goes directly to Google, they miss the entertainment afforded by apologists trying to defend the indefensible.

Simon Belmont wrote:

jon wrote:From another poster on a different board:

You have a lot of dumb questions.

Have you ever heard of Google?

And, unsurprisingly, you have no answers...

DrW wrote:Simon,

If one goes directly to Google, they miss the entertainment afforded by apologists trying to defend the indefensible.

And once again, DrW: if the church is indefensible and demonstrably false (as you often claim), why does it continue to be defended and why has no one demonstrated it to be false?

And jon...

Keep it up. You make anti-Mormons look bad.

Simon Belmont wrote:

DrW wrote:Simon,

If one goes directly to Google, they miss the entertainment afforded by apologists trying to defend the indefensible.

And once again, DrW: if the church is indefensible and demonstrably false (as you often claim), why does it continue to be defended and why has no one demonstrated it to be false?

And jon...

Keep it up. You make anti-Mormons look bad.

Hi Simon, just for clarity, I'm not anti-mormon but I am pro-truth.
I realise that causes a conflict but that's hardly my fault.

I notice you still haven't posted anything substantive to the thread content.

Simon Belmont wrote:

DrW wrote:Simon,

If one goes directly to Google, they miss the entertainment afforded by apologists trying to defend the indefensible.

And once again, DrW: if the church is indefensible and demonstrably false (as you often claim), why does it continue to be defended and why has no one demonstrated it to be false?

And jon...

Keep it up. You make anti-Mormons look bad.

It's been demonstrated many times to be false.

Simon Belmont wrote:
And once again, DrW: if the church is indefensible and demonstrably false (as you often claim), why does it continue to be defended

For the same reason a young earth does. For the same reason a world wide flood does. For the same reason Bigfoot does. For the same reason a host of beliefs that are demonstrably false are defended..