Phasing the Temple out.
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:51 pm
If Monson has a soul and is concerned for his afterlife why doesn't he just stop Endowments and Dead Redemption.
Having marriages in the temple seems to be an acceptable reason to have temples. Endowments and Handclasps seem too funny.
I know people who walked out of the temple wondering if the Church was still true. I'm guessing most of them justified it by holding to the Values of the LDS they were taught before the went through the temple.
I know when i was a child i thought i would be hurt by my parents or cast out of the group for quiting the faith, i just feel bad for those other people who went to the temple and found out if they do leave they will have their blood spilled out and their face ripped apart.
I can't imagine how the Utah cops kept it quiet when they found some guy dead on the road with his tongue in the gutter.
Why doesn't Monson just end most of the temple stuff?
Having marriages in the temple seems to be an acceptable reason to have temples. Endowments and Handclasps seem too funny.
I know people who walked out of the temple wondering if the Church was still true. I'm guessing most of them justified it by holding to the Values of the LDS they were taught before the went through the temple.
I know when i was a child i thought i would be hurt by my parents or cast out of the group for quiting the faith, i just feel bad for those other people who went to the temple and found out if they do leave they will have their blood spilled out and their face ripped apart.
I can't imagine how the Utah cops kept it quiet when they found some guy dead on the road with his tongue in the gutter.
Why doesn't Monson just end most of the temple stuff?