Page 1 of 23
Off topic Schryvery comments reDon Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:44 pm
by _Dan Vogel
Nomad,
I am amused to see that Schryver and Vogel more or less agree about this Bradley argument. That’s got to be a first.
Funny, Schryver said almost the same thing you said. Wink! Wink! Schryver is highly motivated to agree with me, what’s your excuse? To duplicate his arguments and then to mention me as he did is just too obvious, don’t you think?
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:18 pm
by _malkie
Dan Vogel wrote:Nomad,
I am amused to see that Schryver and Vogel more or less agree about this Bradley argument. That’s got to be a first.
Funny, Schryver said almost the same thing you said. Wink! Wink! Schryver is highly motivated to agree with me, what’s your excuse? To duplicate his arguments and then to mention me as he did is just too obvious, don’t you think?
Why, whatever are you suggesting? Nudge! Nudge! Say no more!
ETA: Do you think that Nomad is correct in his assessment of the degree of agreement between you and Schryver?
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:10 pm
by _Buffalo
Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:45 pm
by _malkie
Buffalo wrote:Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
Should Will write a book: "Nomad knows my history"? (;=(
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:51 pm
by _jon
malkie wrote:Buffalo wrote:Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
Should Will write a book: "Nomad knows my history"? (;=(
"Nomad is an island unto himselves"
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:53 pm
by _Buffalo
malkie wrote:Buffalo wrote:Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
Should Will write a book: "Nomad knows my history"? (;=(

Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:03 pm
by _Fence Sitter
malkie wrote:Buffalo wrote:Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
Should Will write a book: "Nomad knows my history"? (;=(
Best line of the year!
More Schryver derail: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:47 pm
by _Nomad
Buffalo wrote:Will, why do you refer to yourself in the third person ("Schryver"). We all know that you're Nomad. Everyone on MAD knows it too. Why the charade?
As I'm sure the site admins here know very well, I don't post via a proxy. I post from the same IP address and always have. If I were Will's sockpuppet, I'm pretty sure they would have figured that out long before now and "outed" me. But they don't. Because they can't. And I (we?) really don't care either way. At least I don't. You're free to believe what you will. I think it's kind of funny. I think Will thinks it's kind of funny.
-Nomad is an island. Nomad stands alone.
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:47 pm
by _jon
Nomad wrote:That's interesting. I just made this post at MDD that makes a similar point:
Read hereYou better watch out or people are going to start saying that you are a sockpuppet, too.
No they won't.
I'm clearly not a misogynist.
I'm not a multi personalitied poster sounding mostly like Schryver.
I would be grateful if you never make any connection like that ever again, even in jest.
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:48 pm
by _Nomad
jon wrote:Nomad wrote:That's interesting. I just made this post at MDD that makes a similar point:
Read hereYou better watch out or people are going to start saying that you are a sockpuppet, too.
No they won't.
I'm clearly not a misogynist.
I'm not a multi personalitied poster sounding mostly like Schryver.
I would be grateful if you never make any connection like that ever again, even in jest.
Whatever you say, Will.