Books I Haven't Read 1: The Vision of the Annointed

[_Gadianton]

The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy

I have not read this book and I have no plans to read it.

Here are what a few of the raving reviewers giving the book five stars say about it:

...when I saw the subtitle of Sowell's book, Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, I knew I had to read it. I was not disappointed.

Why would the subtitle make the book so compelling?

Another writes:

Sowell seems to be letting off a lot of personal steam in this book, again making it a more enjoyable...

Can you imagine a career academic seriously writing a book making the case that the grounds for all social policy in America is "self importance"? Only if the author is "letting off steam" I think, and readers who wish to get a little angry themselves are compelled to read it.

There are two kinds of people in the world. The self-righteous like to tell others how to live their lives and wish to make laws. These people we call liberals. The humble, good folk let others do what they want out of respect for autonomy. And they prefer not to make laws. Surely, this can't be the basis of an entire book?

Well, according to the 5-star reviewers, it is:

Liberalism is a demeaning belief system that seeks to exercise control over others. Liberals do what they do not because they really want to help others but to make themselves feel better about themselves.

Dr. Sowell's thesis is that there are self-anointed people--liberals--who believe that it is their mission to run people's lives.

Early in the book Sowell makes it clear that the anointed vision is predominant not because it is empirically correct, but because it provides its visionaries with a sense of being on the moral high ground compared to the benighted others

Here Sowell enlightens us as to the true nature of the self-righteous leftist; a person who believes himself "anointed" while all the rest of us are inferiors by comparison

The central premise of the book is that the policies enacted by liberal thinkers are more about self-aggrandizement than about implementing true...

Far from being a mindless bashing of the left, this book discusses a certain world view based upon a psychology of self-importance and self-congratulation that permits those burdened with these qualities to pronounce for others how to live, think, work, and behave.

This books outlines and analyzes the many legal social policy decisions rendered over the years based upon this group's own ever-growing sense of their own moral superiority

Liberals are not uninformed; they read the same books, newspapers and academic journals as conservatives or libertarians. So why do they so consistently advocate policies whose results are demonstrably contrary to the results they claim to want?

What a earth-shattering, original idea. The world is in trouble because the people making laws are a bunch of arrogant pricks. I haven't read the book, so if what I've given is not a fair synopsis of Sowell's work, then he better be writing for money and fame and hope his fan base holds no real power.

Some consider this book to be among the top 10 most important books written, EVER. (one reviewer put it in the top 3)

It is not an important book at all, it turns out.

[_Dr. Shades]

It is not an important book at all, it turns out.

And you know this without having read the book?

[_Gadianton]

That is my opinion, Dr. Shades.

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

Gadianton,

Unfortunately, I have read this book. It sucked (for lack of a better word). My advice is that if you are the type of person who burns only two books a year, then burn this book twice.

[_Gadianton]

LOL! Great idea Wang Chung.

If someone would only send me a copy as a gift.

[_Kishkumen]

Gadianton,

Unfortunately, I have read this book. It sucked (for lack of a better word). My advice is that if you are the type of person who burns only two books a year, then burn this book twice.

Genius. I abhor book burnings, but I am willing to make an exception for this tripe.

[_Aristotle Smith]

I haven't read this book either, but how does this relate to Mormonism?

[_Gadianton]

Well AS, that's a great question. I'll bet Droopy has an answer for that.

Droopy?

[_Daniel Peterson]

Genius. I abhor book burnings, but I am willing to make an exception for this tripe.

Have you read the book?

Thomas Sowell is extraordinarily bright and insightful.

I'm betting you haven't.

Chris Smith's recent paper at BYU was "excellent," though you hadn't actually read it.

Dr. Sowell's book is "tripe," though you probably haven't read it.

Saves time, I guess.

[_Buffalo]

Genius. I abhor book burnings, but I am willing to make an exception for this tripe.

Have you read the book?

Thomas Sowell is extraordinarily bright and insightful.

I'm betting you haven't.

Chris Smith's recent paper at BYU was "excellent," though you hadn't actually read it.

Dr. Sowell's book is "tripe," though you probably haven't read it.

Saves time, I guess.

Kind of like that review of the Book of Mormon musical.