Page 1 of 1

Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:26 pm
by _DarkHelmet
Those who think Star Wars is true (with every fiber of their being) are rejoicing at the latest scientific evidence supporting their claims.

http://news.yahoo.com/planet-star-wars- ... 04397.html

It's a real-life Tatooine. A spectacle made popular by the "Star Wars" saga — a planet with two suns — has now been confirmed in space for the first time, astronomers revealed.

Scientists using NASA's Kepler space telescope captured details of a giant planet in orbit around the pair of binary stars that make up the Kepler-16 system, which is about 200 light-years away.

"This discovery is stunning," said study co-author Alan Boss at the Carnegie Institute in Washington. "Once again, what used to be science fiction has turned into reality." [See an image and video of Tatooine planet Kepler 16b]

When Tatooine was depicted on film, many scientists doubted that such planets could really exist. Now there's proof.

"It's possible that there's a real Tatooine out there," said John Knoll, visual effects supervisor at the special-effects firm Industrial Light and Magic, which was behind the "Star Wars" films. "Kepler 16b is unambiguous and dramatic proof that planets really do form around binaries."

The new discovery is expanding the bounds of what scientists, as well as filmakers, can conceive, he said.

"Again and again we see that the science is stranger and cooler than fiction," Knoll said during a NASA press conference today. "The very existence of these discoveries gives us cause to dream bigger, to question our assumptions."

The planet, dubbed Kepler-16(AB)-b, passes in front of both stars in view of the satellite, regularly dimming their light. Each star also eclipses its companion as they orbit each other. Altogether, these motions allow scientists to precisely calculate the masses, radii and trajectories of all three bodies.

The newfound planet keeps a distance from its stars nearly three-quarters that of the distance between the Earth and the sun. It is somewhat like Saturn in size, although nearly 50 percent denser, suggesting it is richer in heavy elements. [10 Real Alien Worlds That Could Be In 'Star Wars']

"Kepler-16(AB)-b is not habitable as we know it," said study lead author Laurance Doyle , an astrophysicist at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute in Mountain View, Calif.

This alien world travels on a nearly circular 229-day orbit around its two parent stars, Kepler-16A and Kepler-16B, which are about 69 and 20 percent as massive as the sun, respectively. The stars keep close to each other — only a fifth of the distance between Earth and the sun on average, which is closer than Mercury gets to the sun — completing an orbit around each other every 41 days, researchers added. [Infographic: New Planet is Like "Star Wars'" Tatooine]

Worlds that orbit around two stars, known as circumbinary planets, had been hinted at before. Stars in pairs both orbit around a point in space called barycenter, and researchers at times saw these orbits were slightly off, suggesting the presence of a planet tugging at both stars. However, Kepler-16(AB)-b is the first planet that scientists have detected directly passing in front of, or transiting, its stars, temporarily dimming their light.

Since the movements of this world and its two stars are all virtually confined to the same plane, the researchers suggest they all formed from the same disk of dust and gas. Planets that were captured from other star systems might be expected to orbit at a range of angles.

"Now that we know how to detect circumbinary planets, I think we are going to find a lot more rapidly," Doyle told SPACE.com.

The scientists detailed their findings in the Sept. 16 issue of the journal Science.

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:35 pm
by _Buffalo
It's kind of sad that the Book of Mormon has never had a bullseye of comparable magnitude.

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:04 pm
by _Darth J
How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:08 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
Darth J wrote:How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?


lol

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:13 pm
by _Buffalo
Darth J wrote:How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?


Of course, the Lord isn't going to provide us with conclusive proof that Star Wars is real. He'll give us just enough to encourage our faith, but not so much as to impede our free will to attend the Star Wars section at next year's Comicon.

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:42 pm
by _Hasa Diga Eebowai
-

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:50 pm
by _Darth J
From FARMS (Foundation for Astronomical Research and Mandalorian Studies):

"The importance of Star Wars lies not in its astronomical location, but in its ability to bring us to a knowledge of the Force."

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:27 pm
by _DrW
Darth J wrote:From FARMS (Foundation for Astronomical Research and Mandalorian Studies):

"The importance of Star Wars lies not in its astronomical location, but in its ability to bring us to a knowledge of the Force."

Exactly!

It is gratifying to see that a critic is capable of really understanding these things.