DiscussMormonism.com

Evaporates into the air when you look at what some of them actually looked like.

Buffalo's claim disappears in a puff of logic when one realizes his picture is of homo erectus and not homo sapiens.

bcspace wrote:Buffalo's claim disappears in a puff of logic when one realizes his picture is of homo erectus and not homo sapiens.

The point -------->















[[YOUR HEAD]]

BC, are you saying that homo erectus aren't pre-Adamites? I thought you believed in evolution.

bcspace wrote:Buffalo's claim disappears in a puff of logic when one realizes his picture is of homo erectus and not homo sapiens.

homo sapiens only appeared ~6000 years ago?

Buffalo wrote:Evaporates into the air when you look at what some of them actually looked like.

She doesn't resemble either of the temple movie Eves that I recall.

sock puppet wrote:She doesn't resemble either of the temple movie Eves that I recall.

It was before she got that overbite fixed.

schreech wrote:

bcspace wrote:Buffalo's claim disappears in a puff of logic when one realizes his picture is of homo erectus and not homo sapiens.

homo sapiens only appeared ~6000 years ago?

BC's would argue that Adamites are the holy variant of Modern Man and not homo erectus. Modern Man was kicking around the plains of the Serengeti some 250,000 years ago give or take. The variant Holy Adamite Man was created a mere 6,000 years ago in the Garden of Eden in Missouri, between the Tigress and Euphrates rivers.

.

bcspace wrote:Buffalo's claim disappears in a puff of logic when one realizes his picture is of homo erectus and not homo sapiens.

Do you believe (like you are supposed to) that every person alive on the planet originates soley from the two people created in or around Missouri 6,000 years ago known popularly as Adam and Eve?

Buffalo wrote:Evaporates into the air when you look at what some of them actually looked like.

I don't know why but the one on the right kind of turns me on.