DiscussMormonism.com

stemelbow wrote:Surely this joint can be rather obscure, as there are maybe 100 or so people who post here and read here, and also house the words from Schryver that are problematic from the perspective of the Maxwell Institute. This place doesn’t have to have a lot of traffic or have much influence at all for the words he put down to be problematic. No one wants to be associated with those pathetic comments he offered when speaking to some of the women posters here. Dj seems to think there is some sort of double standard going on when I say that, but boy is he wrong. Words here can be sent all over the web within seconds. Surely we can clearly see how this place, though obscure relatively speaking, can have some of Will’s words/ideas/comments that the Maxwell Institute doesn’t want to be associated with.

Have you read what William Schryver has posted over on Mormon Discussions? It's absolutely foul. I can't even post what he's written because it would get moderated here immediately! He used such horribly crude, sexually explicit language that I quite honestly only got part way through reading the evidence against him before I'd had enough. He treats women in such a disrespectful manner that it's appalling (he's even posted things about his wife and daughter that are very insulting and sexually explicit).

stemelbow wrote:http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18091

Here ya go. You asked for it.

Corpsegrinder wrote:Lemme guess...in a former life you were named Silver Hammer, right?

Corpsegrinder wrote:It's in the thread. Read it. You'll understand.

Mattie wrote:If you had read my first post, you would have seen that I said I had read that thread. I saw that Will used the word "bitch" a couple times. Is that what you're talking about?

stemelbow wrote:

Mattie wrote:If you had read my first post, you would have seen that I said I had read that thread. I saw that Will used the word "bitch" a couple times. Is that what you're talking about?

A'ighty. I didn't know that's the thread you were talking about. I'm not going to recreate the case. I think it was made quite well there. I bleieve it was in that thread that someone suggested that the reason MI decided to drop his publication was because of the information in that thread. I'd say its worse than just saying the b word a couple times. It was more like a pattern of speaking poorly to women posters here, constantly throwing weird sexual or derogatory comments at them because they are women. I don't suggest that its mysogeny per se, though.