DiscussMormonism.com

http://lightbox.time.com/2011/12/05/hap ... ringing/#1

Peterson is asked:

William Schryver remains unassociated with the Maxwell Institute due to their refusal to publish his work on the basis of his rampant sexism. Isn't this correct, Dr. Peterson?

And he responds:

I don't believe that it's ever been the policy of the Maxwell Institute to announce editorial decisions and/or the rationale behind them on public message boards or in TIME magazine comment sections.

That policy probably won't change now, either.

Anyway, I don't see the relevance (to either Brian Shumway's photographs or the accompanying essay) of the issue that you and others have tried to raise here. You seem, simply, to be attempting an irrelevant public defamation -- motivated, it appears, by intense personal hatred. Rather curious, I think.

May not be the policy of the NWI, but it is Peterson's policy to register and be as egotistical as ever.

It is amazing to me that he has yet to learn the value of posting online anonymously.

TrashcanMan79 wrote:It is amazing to me that he has yet to learn the value of posting online anonymously.

Who is to say he has not?

Try to keep up. This is very old news. There's already a thread about it.

And...

Who cares what "Peterson" does?

Simon Belmont wrote:Who cares what "Peterson" does?

Mrs. Peterson.

Did Dr. Peterson originally post regarding Times pictorial essay to say that the photographs did not accurately portray the Church members of Utah Valley?

Simon Belmont wrote:Try to keep up. This is very old news. There's already a thread about it.

And...

Who cares what "Peterson" does?

So, it's old news and there is already a thread.

It seems YOU care about what Peterson does.

Just saying.

Paul O

There is already another thread about this. Simon, you are correct in that regard.

The significances of Infymus starting the thread he did are that the OP shows that independently of that other thread (a) Infymus found the Time comments on the internet, (b) Infymus found them interesting enough to start a thread here reporting it, (c) Infymus found DCP's posting there to be "as egotistical as ever", and (g) Infymus provides the question and DCP's answer thereto that Infymus thinks is illustrative of that egotism.

So instead of issuing your SHRA that it's 'old news', Infymus starting this thread and posting the OP he did is quite significant in its own right.

sock puppet wrote:(a) Infymus found the Time comments on the internet,

Of course he did. He, no doubt, searches the Internet every day for things Peterson is doing. He's unhealthily obsessed with the man.

Of course he did. He, no doubt, searches the Internet every day for things Peterson is doing. He's unhealthily obsessed with the man.

Before you cast the first stone, Simon, let's confess your unhealthy ventures. I can only imagine that you Google about at least as much as he does. How else do you get your facts?

:-)

Paul O

Shulem wrote:Before you cast the first stone, Simon, let's confess your unhealthy ventures. I can only imagine that you Google about at least as much as he does. How else do you get your facts?

What facts?