Page 1 of 5
Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:44 pm
by _Melchett
Safe amongst his people, Schryver wrote:In the way of news: I have, in the past few days, completed the initial drafts of two articles that address major shortcomings in the Hauglid analysis (sparse as it was) of the Abraham manuscripts. I have commenced a much longer third article that will simultaneously address another important shortcoming in the Hauglid analysis of the Abraham manuscripts, and also constitute a comprehensive critique of the 2010 JWHA Christopher Smith paper: The Dependence of Abraham 1:1-3 on the Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar.
Barring any unforeseen complications, all three articles will be published during the first half of 2012
How long is this going to be spun out?
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:08 am
by _Hasa Diga Eebowai
-
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:42 am
by _Kishkumen
Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:47 am
by _harmony
Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:58 am
by _Fence Sitter
I look forward to his announcement of the second draft of the semi-final-pre-edited-post spell checked-partially completed trial electronic version of the final uncensored preliminary edition that is being withheld due to the evil attention it is getting from the board that must not be named and will only be sent to those worthy of such a magnum opus.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:00 am
by _Darth J
Schryver promised to use me as proof of the sound methodology of his "substantial word study."
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14289&p=356259#p356259viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14289&p=356416#p356416I sure hope this is my year!
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:00 am
by _Melchett
harmony wrote:Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
No. Same game, different teams.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:04 am
by _Melchett
Slightly O/T,, but from the same thread 'over there'
Stroking Will's massive ego, Mr Englund wrote:Besides, I would be doing my opponents a disservice if I didn't challenge there ideas and correct there mistakes, just as they have done with me and mine.
I'm rather tempted to sign up just to tell him it's
their ideas and
their mistakes.
But that would just be petty.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:47 am
by _Kishkumen
harmony wrote:Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
Will is convinced that there are false friends of the Restoration, or at least sadly mistaken ones, among the BYU folk and the apologists. Bokovoy, Hauglid, and Hodges are among their number, in Will's narcissistic imagination. Really, they simply don't agree with him. But to Will that is practically tantamount to being an enemy of God.
Re: Schryver in 2012 perhaps?
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:48 am
by _Kishkumen
Melchett wrote:But that would just be petty.
Good decision. You should know that Wade has a learning disability.