Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Spurven Ten Sing
_Emeritus
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am

Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _Spurven Ten Sing »

"The best website in prehistory." -Paid Actor www.cavemandiaries.com
_Panopticon
_Emeritus
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:25 pm

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _Panopticon »

"Theism, with its vision of an orderly universe superintended by a God who created rational-minded creatures in his own image, "is vastly more hospitable to science than naturalism," with its random process of natural selection, he writes."

I tend to lump evolution deniers with Holocaust deniers and UFOlogists.
http://www.Theofrak.com - because traditional religion is so frakked up
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Hi spurven,

Your praise is much too high, but thank you.

To be honest, I’m really saddened by this. It’s very dangerous for a philosopher to wade into the scientific realm without some serious training before hand (like a undergrad degree or something), because you can’t rely on popular works.

This book is not exactly getting a warm reception either, and apparently in a chapter on Behe, the only critic of Behe that Plantinga looks at is by philosopher Paul Draper. Now I love Draper, one of my favorite philosophers, but he isn’t the first or even 10th person you should go to when concerning Behe’s thesis.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _EAllusion »

In a happy coincidnece, one of my favorite philosphers, Eliott Sober, is responsible for writing some brutal takedowns of Plantinga's naturalism defeated and Behe's form of intelligent design arguments.


http://fitelson.org/plant.pdf

http://philosophy.wisc.edu/sober/ID&PRword.PDF
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

EAllusion wrote:In a happy coincidnece, one of my favorite philosphers, Eliott Sober, is responsible for writing some brutal takedowns of Plantinga's naturalism defeated and Behe's form of intelligent design arguments.


http://fitelson.org/plant.pdf

http://philosophy.wisc.edu/sober/ID&PRword.PDF


Elliot Sober is just awesome.
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _LDSToronto »

MrStakhanovite wrote:Hi spurven,

Your praise is much too high


Damn right.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_KevinSim
_Emeritus
Posts: 2962
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:31 am

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _KevinSim »

Panopticon wrote:"Theism, with its vision of an orderly universe superintended by a God who created rational-minded creatures in his own image, "is vastly more hospitable to science than naturalism," with its random process of natural selection, he writes."

I tend to lump evolution deniers with Holocaust deniers and UFOlogists.

Panopticon, what's your point? I read the article, which clearly said that Platinga isn't an evolution denier, and neither am I.

Evolution certainly questions whether deities are needed as an explanation for how biological creatures (like humans) came about, but it has been a long time since I saw that as an important role for God. Humanity doesn't need God to create it; humanity needs God to preserve it. Without someone who knows how to preserve some good things from humanity, the day will eventually come when humanity (or for that matter anything that evolves from humanity) will all be extinct, and the universe will go on as if humanity had never existed. That's a future I can't accept; yet it will inevitably come without a deity to prevent it.
KevinSim

Reverence the eternal.
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _Tarski »

KevinSim wrote:yet it will inevitably come without a deity to prevent it.


Nonsense. There is no evidence that a God is needed to preserve goodness. The idea that it would all go down the crapper without a magical supervisor is just based on your fears.
Besides, preserving a species and preserving goodness do not seem to be necessarily connected anyway. An evil and violent breed of humans might be quite good at reproducing. Indeed, we are such.

By the way, if your God is in the preventing business then it seems clear that your God needs to do a lot more and better preventing (not to mention preserving)!
To wit:
Image
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

But Tarski...helping those people would have violated their Free Agency! The greatest gift Heavenly Father has given us!
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Request for comment by Stak, the philosophy god.

Post by _Tarski »

MrStakhanovite wrote:But Tarski...helping those people would have violated their Free Agency! The greatest gift Heavenly Father has given us!



Which is why, as a parent, I would never step in to stop it if one of my kids was cracking another one of my kids over the head with a frying pan. I must not remove the free agency of the agressor!
After all, the only kind of freedom worth having is the freedom to destroy lives and cause horrible pain (never mind the fact that a dead or maimed person is somewhat less free).
(not)

Praise the God who preserved the free agency of the Nazis but not the free agency of those shackled and starving Jews.

I wonder what the world would be like if it there was nothing to prevent evil but human beings themselves (would it look kinda like the one we live in?)
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
Post Reply